I say it so it's known: even the right wing knew it wasn't me

Spain's 1978 Constitution guarantees the presumption of innocence, and the 1982 law protects honour. A family nickname is not proof.

English · Original discussion in Spanish · Published

A family may know who did what and hand out nicknames, but suspicion is not proof and does not authorize naming anyone. Without a court ruling, the only thing that stands is the presumption of innocence.

## The nickname as a case file

In families, villages and trades, the nickname acts as a case file: it marks whoever broke the rules and circulates without judge or witness. Repeated often enough, it ends up seeming like a fact.

That a closed group "knows" something only means it has told the same version many times.

## What the law requires before naming someone

Spain's Constitution of **1978**, in article **24.2**, recognizes the presumption of innocence. **Organic Law 1/1982, of 5 May**, protects honour against illegitimate interference.

A nickname is not proof. A suspicion, however firm, proves nothing, and placing a real name behind a crime without a court ruling can have legal consequences.

## Health and family, a minefield

When a dispute brings up diagnoses or physical after-effects, things that have nothing to do with each other get mixed together. Schizophrenia is diagnosed by a healthcare professional; it is not ruled on over a lunch table.

Telling your own side of the story is free. Publishing it as the account of the facts is not. For any health concern, it is best to see a professional.

Also available in: Deutsch

Summary of a discussion on Burbuja.info - Foro de economía, actualidad y política., translated from Spanish and reviewed before publication. Read the full discussion (0 replies).

More summaries

All summaries in English →

-
Back