ACOM files complaint against Gisbert for Holocaust denial
Being reported for questioning historical figures is, in theory, a legal matter. In practice, it has become the perfect warning to anyone who dares to challenge the official narrative. The complaint by the Spanish collective ACOM against the lawyer Gisbert for Holocaust denial points in that direction.
The case is not an isolated one. Those who have traveled down the road of historical revisionism know the story of Frederick Toben, prosecuted in Australia, or that of Jerome Brentar, who spent 500,000 dollars of his own money on legal defenses. The judicial machine does not always distinguish between denying a crime and asking questions about the figures.
If the goal was to bury the debate, the result has been the opposite: every complaint turns an unknown into a martyr and the law into a suspect. How many verdicts are needed before someone dares to ask out loud?
Summary of a discussion on Burbuja.info - Foro de economía, actualidad y política., translated from Spanish and reviewed before publication.
Read the full discussion (40 replies).
Ceuta's children spend the summer confined by the migratory crisis, losing their freedom and their city. Anxious parents face an uncertain return to school.
Austria, Germany, the Netherlands, Denmark and Greece have formed a coalition to deport migrants and plan return centres before the end of 2026, according to a…
Analysis of the Andalusian elections in Spain: the PP misses an absolute majority, the PSOE holds firm, Podemos doubles its vote and Vox stalls. Who really won?