From Caravaggio's dirty fingernail to the shopping tsarina: the art of doubt
The Incredulity of Saint Thomas is not just a Bible passage; it is a laboratory of styles. Duccio paints it with Byzantine gold in the Maestà, Verrocchio sculpts it in bronze with a forensic pose, Rubens bathes it in Flemish Baroque. But the one who really puts his finger on the wound is Caravaggio: in his 1602 version, on display at Sanssouci, Thomas pushes his index finger into Christ's wound with dirty fingernails. There is no clean miracle here, there is flesh, scabs and a cellar-like spotlight that leaves little to the imagination.
Rembrandt, in 1634 (today in the Pushkin Museum), chooses the opposite: a mass of chiaroscuro where the apostles argue like shopkeepers and faith is lost in the shadows. The painting is an exercise in pictorial doubt, not certainty.
But the most surprising fact is not on the canvas. The Rembrandt belonged to the Prussian merchant Johann Ernst Gotzkowsky, who planned to sell it to Frederick the Great. The king, ruined by wars, said no. Enter Catherine the Great, who bought Gotzkowsky's 90 works and, along the way, entire collections: the Saxon Brühl's 600 paintings, the Crozat Collection (with Rembrandt's Danaë and Giorgione's Judith) and Walpole's 198. The tsarina, a German princess who reached the throne through a coup, needed to present herself as enlightened. Art was not culture: it was an imperial marketing operation.
Summary of a discussion on Burbuja.info - Foro de economía, actualidad y política., translated from Spanish and reviewed before publication.
Read the full discussion (20 replies).
From Duccio to Rubens, seven versions of the Supper at Emmaus trace the evolution of sacred art from the Middle Ages to the Baroque, with dogs, cats and knowing glances along the way.
A 1936 video shows a boy smoking a cigar, but it was made of chocolate. Between luxury trains and motorways, Nazi Germany both fascinates and repels. An ironic take.