Feminists vs Torbe: the debate nobody wants

Feminists vs Torbe: why they refuse a face-to-face debate

The case of Natxo Allende, better known as Torbe, has raised an uncomfortable question: why do the leading figures of feminism shun public debate with a man they consider a symbol of sensual exploitation? The answer, however, is not as obvious as it seems.

Lack of legitimacy as an excuse

One of the most repeated arguments is that debating someone with serious legal troubles whose career is built on the adult film industry would whitewash his image or hand him an undeserved platform. Many sectors of feminism hold that you cannot engage in dialogue with someone who embodies exactly what they fight against. Added to this is the difference in language: while feminist discourse operates in sociology and human rights, Torbe appeals to individual libertarianism and provocation.

Antiestéticar or strategy?

The other side of the coin is the perception that activists antiestéticar being out-argued by a figure who knows how to exploit the levers of controversy and who, moreover, can point to the voluntary participation of the women in his videos. Those who hold this view consider Torbe slippery and believe a public debate would only give him ammunition for his narrative. However, there are also those who think refusing to debate is a tactical mistake that leaves the field open to his version of events.

In any case, the decision not to confront him face to face comes down to a mix of principles and political calculation. For now, silence remains the dominant strategy. And until a showdown takes place, each side will be able to keep telling its own version.