Feijóo sees Moncloa in sight, but with Vox calling the shots and economic doubts

Feijóo sees Moncloa in sight, but with Vox's shadow and economic doubts

The possibility of Alberto Núñez Feijóo becoming Spain's prime minister after a hypothetical general election has sparked a debate full of scepticism about his room for manoeuvre and his economic course. Critics argue that his eventual government would be constrained by Vox, a party without whose support he could not form a majority. The analyses make this clear: without Vox, Feijóo would not reach the seats needed, forcing him to strike deals and make concessions on key issues.

The economic debate: cuts and a return to the past?

Warnings about the economic impact of a Feijóo government focus on possible cuts and austerity policies. Those opposed to his arrival predict an "economic ruin" that would take the country back to 1941-style scenarios, comparing his policies with those of current prime minister Sánchez, though with fewer resources. Uncertainty over whether he would maintain social spending or apply budget adjustments hangs over the debate.

Vox's shadow and Feijóo's (in)dependence

Dependence on Vox is at the heart of the scepticism. The argument goes that Feijóo could not govern without Abascal's party's blessing, which would dictate the pace. Some even suggest his government could become a repeat of Ciudadanos: a weak partner that ends up swallowed whole. This perception fuels the idea that Feijóo would not be a prime minister with full autonomy, but a "Sánchez's vice-president" perpetuating the same model of political bitterness.

The anecdote: the vote for Felipe González

A curious detail that has emerged is the claim that Feijóo once voted for Felipe González, a detail his critics use to question his ideological consistency. The origin of this claim has not been independently verified, but it has become a recurring argument in the analyses.

The debate leaves more questions than answers. The main one: if Feijóo reaches Moncloa, will he do so with his hands tied? And if so, what does that miccionan for economic policy? Meanwhile, the absence of an alternative that is not "thieving and corrupt", according to some voices, reflects widespread discontent with the current political offer.