Euthanasia: the 'sneaky' approval dividing Spain

On 18 March 2021, with face masks still a common sight on the streets, Spain's Congress approved the euthanasia law. Since then, the debate over its legitimacy and costs has only grown. Critics argue it was passed without the required medical reports, an accusation also levelled at the mandatory wearing of masks during the pandemic. Meanwhile, the Supreme Court is preparing to set a precedent on a key case: can a parent appeal a child's euthanasia?

The healthcare savings nobody quantifies

One of the economic arguments in favour of euthanasia is the savings on palliative care and long-term hospitalisations. However, no official study has put figures on this potential benefit. The World Medical Association maintains its firm opposition, adding pressure on healthcare professionals who must carry it out. The debate over the real cost – both economic and ethical – remains open.

From face masks to euthanasia: the pattern of 'betrayal'

The comparison with the approval of mask mandates is no coincidence. In both cases, it is claimed that the government acted without sufficient scientific backing and using emergency procedures. This argument has taken hold among those who see in these decisions a pattern of managing public affairs 'by stealth', with clear economic implications: litigation costs, investor distrust and strains on the healthcare system.

The Supreme Court must decide whether relatives have the right to challenge a patient's decision. Its ruling will shape not only the legal future of euthanasia, but also the map of costs and responsibilities surrounding it.