Europe Loses. The US Wins
An analysis of how sanctions on Russia have driven up Europe's energy costs, crushed its industry and enriched the United States. Data and perspectives on the
English · Original discussion in Spanish · Published
Europe pays Ukraine war's energy bill: the US reaps the benefits
Europe has replaced cheap Russian gas with far more expensive American liquefied natural gas, destroying its industrial competitiveness and transferring billions to Washington. The shift was no accident, but the result of political decisions that have strategically weakened the continent.
The energy model that worked (and was blown up)
Until 2022, Europe enjoyed a stable continental supply: pipelines such as Nord Stream and Druzhba delivered Russian gas at low cost, with long-term contracts that guaranteed predictable prices. That system allowed German, French and Italian industry to compete globally. Sanctions on Russia and the pipeline sabotage put an end to it.
The alternative was LNG, bought on the spot market at volatile prices and requiring liquefaction and regasification infrastructure. The main supplier has been the United States, whose exports have soared. Europe's energy costs have multiplied, while America's have stayed low thanks to its own shale gas.
Deindustrialization is already here
Higher energy bills have forced companies such as steelmakers and chemical firms to cut production or relocate to the US or Asia. Europe's competitive advantage has vanished. Meanwhile, Washington has secured a reliable gas supply for itself and a huge market for its LNG, while weakening a geopolitical rival.
Some analyses point out that US fracking faces diminishing returns, so this advantage could be temporary. But in the short term, the transfer of wealth from Europe to the United States is unequivocal.
The harshest criticism: elite betrayal
One school of thought holds that European elites, especially German ones, deliberately acted against their countries' interests, aligned with Washington. Atlantic dependence and globalist ideology would have taken precedence over economic rationality. A more pragmatic position argues that the European Union had no alternative after the invasion of Ukraine, but that the execution was disastrous.
The historical debate also surfaces: some recall that as far back as World War II and earlier, Anglo-Saxon interests have taken precedence over European unity. The constant, they say, is that the European establishment always ends up sacrificing its own people.
The open question is whether Europe can reverse this dynamic or whether, as with the industrial offshoring of the 1990s, the damage is irreversible. Next winter's data will be key.
Related debates in the forum
Europe has replaced cheap Russian gas with far more expensive American liquefied natural gas, destroying its industrial competitiveness and transferring billions to Washington. The shift was no accident, but the result of political decisions that have strategically weakened the continent.
The energy model that worked (and was blown up)
Until 2022, Europe enjoyed a stable continental supply: pipelines such as Nord Stream and Druzhba delivered Russian gas at low cost, with long-term contracts that guaranteed predictable prices. That system allowed German, French and Italian industry to compete globally. Sanctions on Russia and the pipeline sabotage put an end to it.
The alternative was LNG, bought on the spot market at volatile prices and requiring liquefaction and regasification infrastructure. The main supplier has been the United States, whose exports have soared. Europe's energy costs have multiplied, while America's have stayed low thanks to its own shale gas.
Deindustrialization is already here
Higher energy bills have forced companies such as steelmakers and chemical firms to cut production or relocate to the US or Asia. Europe's competitive advantage has vanished. Meanwhile, Washington has secured a reliable gas supply for itself and a huge market for its LNG, while weakening a geopolitical rival.
Some analyses point out that US fracking faces diminishing returns, so this advantage could be temporary. But in the short term, the transfer of wealth from Europe to the United States is unequivocal.
The harshest criticism: elite betrayal
One school of thought holds that European elites, especially German ones, deliberately acted against their countries' interests, aligned with Washington. Atlantic dependence and globalist ideology would have taken precedence over economic rationality. A more pragmatic position argues that the European Union had no alternative after the invasion of Ukraine, but that the execution was disastrous.
The historical debate also surfaces: some recall that as far back as World War II and earlier, Anglo-Saxon interests have taken precedence over European unity. The constant, they say, is that the European establishment always ends up sacrificing its own people.
The open question is whether Europe can reverse this dynamic or whether, as with the industrial offshoring of the 1990s, the damage is irreversible. Next winter's data will be key.
Related debates in the forum
- Peter Turchin and the prediction of history through advanced mathematical models and AI. · 47 replies
- Stale, solidified gossip: NN, Farrerons and Rubén Gisbert. · 33 replies
- Zapatero the Pharisee, seeing is believing · 19 replies
- Sánchez says he won't call elections because if he did, he'd win by a landslide. · 46 replies
Also available in: Deutsch
Summary of a discussion on Burbuja.info - Foro de economía, actualidad y política., translated from Spanish and reviewed before publication. Read the full discussion (50 replies).
More summaries
-
VOX brings its agenda to Europe: digital euro, Ceuta, and the Green Deal
VOX ramps up its European offensive in 2026: opposing the digital euro, cutting funds to Morocco, addressing the Ceuta crisis, and rejecting the Green Deal.
-
Europe without borders: the immigration debate shaking up politics
Denmark asks Brussels to investigate Sánchez's mass regularization in Spain. Crime and jihadism cases fuel a debate that shows no sign of stopping.
-
Iustitia Europa: From Challenging EU Elections to Suing Spain’s Government
Iustitia Europa challenged the July 9 election results, lost 800 votes, and filed lawsuits against Prime Minister Sánchez, Interior Minister Marlaska, and Begoña Gómez.
-
Satire Claims Ayuso Hears 7,291 Ghost Voices, Seeks Iker Jiménez
A satirical story attributes 7,291 paranormal voices and six years of insomnia to Madrid's Isabel Díaz Ayuso, leading her to consult TV presenter Iker Jiménez.
-
Israel's Military Collapse: Armor Losses and Reservist Fatigue
An analysis of Israel's military collapse: demographics, the cost of Merkava tanks, and combat fatigue during the southern Lebanon campaign.
-
The sticking points of the PP-Vox deal in Extremadura, Spain
Extremadura approves national priority for housing: 10 years of residence registration required. Is it legal? An analysis of the PP-Vox pact and the Spanish Government's reaction.