Dozens of Graves Vandalized in Two Valencia Towns

Graves were found open and niches destroyed in Bufalí and Guadasséquies cemeteries, with bodies removed from coffins.

English · Original discussion in Spanish · Published

Dozens of Graves Vandalized in Two Valencia Towns

Hands opening niches at dawn, remains outside coffins, and broken tombstones. This is what was found in the cemetery of Bufalí, in the province of Valencia, after similar vandalism occurred days earlier in Guadasséquies, just a few kilometers away in the same comarca. The reports came from El Español, Levante-EMV, and Antena 3. None of the published information mentions cameras, surveillance, or witnesses: only peine graves and neighbors wondering who spends an entire night doing this. What has raised the case goes far beyond two small towns.

What is known about the desecrations in Bufalí and Guadasséquies

The pattern repeats. Access to the site, opening of dozens of graves, bodies extracted from coffins, and destroyed niches. In Bufalí, the desecration trinc one suffered in Guadasséquies, in the same comarca, and early accounts place it at least a week before the issue began circulating. None of the published reports identify a perpetrator or confirm a motive through investigation.

The geographic coincidence is what has drawn the most attention: two small municipalities, two cemeteries without permanent security, and the same method. There is, for now, no official statement clarifying if both cases are connected. Without that confirmation, everything else—who, why, with what help—remains speculation.

What do grave robbers look for?

The most circulated hypothesis points to materials accompanying burials: rings, reliquaries, gold pieces, and in some cases, dental prosthetics. The debate has included claims that perpetrators sought gold teeth. It is a possibility, not a proven fact: nothing published so far confirms exactly what was taken or if anything was missing from the graves.

What repeats in messages is the economic logic of looting. Opening a niche requires time, tools, and silence; the potential loot is tiny and only has an outlet in an informal market for metals and used objects. Low profitability, high risk, and damage that cannot be measured in euros, according to those commenting on the case.

Security: 17,682 small cemeteries without night guards

Spain has an arithmetic problem with its cemeteries, according to those involved in the debate. A 2006 count cited in the thread estimated there are 17,682 small-sized cemeteries, and it is argued that most are in municipalities unable to afford private security. The cost of a private guard covering twelve hours every night, seven days a week, has been raised: an expense that, according to these same messages, a small town hall can hardly bear.

There was a time, the thread recalls, when the cemetery had a guard and a loose dog among the graves at nightfall. Recovering that figure sounds romantic, until someone puts a price on the night patrol and compares the bill with the probability of recurrence. The repeated argument is that it is cheaper not to look.

From Pharaohs to the Civil War: desecration has precedents

It is not a new phenomenon nor exclusively local, as has been noted. From ancient Egypt, the looting of pharaohs' tombs to extract gold, precious stones, and all kinds of treasures has been brought up; today the loot is reduced, at best, to a wallet and a reliquary, according to the comparison made in the thread. The same historical comparison has led to the Spanish Civil War, with the remembered image of militiamen next to desecrated nuns in Toledo, an episode that continues to fuel political controversy.

The case of the tomb of the police officer killed in the 11M attacks, in Leganés, has also been recalled, around whose investigation unverified versions have been sustained. And the desecration of Franco's grave has been mentioned, to point out that media scandal depends on who is buried underneath.

Who did it: attributions without proof

Part of the reaction jumped directly to the national origin of the perpetrators. It is necessary to separate what is known from what is assumed: initial reports do not identify any suspect by their origin and there is no official confirmation that nationality has anything to do with the facts. The thread has referred to the detention of at least one person and their subsequent release by judicial decision, an extreme that no official source has ratified in detail.

The temptation to turn a crime into an argument about groups is old and works just as poorly here as in any other case: a desecration is not explained by a passport, but by a motive, means, and opportunity. With available data, all three remain unknown.

Without cameras, without night patrols, and with 17,682 small sites according to the cited count, the arithmetic of security does not add up. What disorients is not the barbarity of the act, but the ease: two cemeteries, two nights, zero witnesses. How many more towns are in the same situation is a question that no census answers.

Also available in: Deutsch

Summary of a discussion on Burbuja.info - Foro de economía, actualidad y política., translated from Spanish and reviewed before publication. Read the full discussion (142 replies).

More summaries

All summaries in English →

-
Back