Did Spain's old BUP Natural Sciences textbooks really have 1,000 pages?

A nostalgic debate claims first-year BUP Natural Sciences books in Spain had nearly 1,000 pages. The data shows they were around 400-500, but academic demands were far higher.

English · Original discussion in Spanish · Published

Natural Sciences in BUP: 1,000-page books or boomer myth?

An educational nostalgia thread has peine the debate about how demanding the old BUP (Spain's pre-LOGSE secondary school system) really was. The initial claim — that the first-year Natural Sciences textbook was nearly 1,000 pages long — triggered a wave of memories, photos and comparisons with today's system. The data shows that while no textbook reached that figure, volumes of 400 to 500 pages were common, with dense content and essay-based exams that would frighten many university students today.


The thousand-page myth

The original claim has no basis: no first-year BUP book reached 1,000 pages. The most frequently cited editions, such as the Anaya one (3rd year BUP, 456 pages) or the Ecir one, were around 300-500 pages. However, the physical size was considerable, with hard covers and few illustrations. One user dug out their 1980 Anaya edition, which covered geology, biology and astronomy in 456 pages. Another showed the legendary "Dualde" from COU (the pre-university year), with 740 pages. The perception of excessive content comes from the fact that multiple subjects were covered in a single volume.

BUP vs. LOGSE standards

Several participants agree that BUP (and especially COU) was a tough academic filter. Exams were essay-based, covered several topics and required continuous study. In contrast, they criticise the Organic Education Law (LOGSE) and later reforms for "softening" the content, cutting pages and replacing text with illustrations. One comment points out that the 3rd-year BUP Anaya book included concepts that today would be "university level". Another recalls that 8th grade of EGB (primary school) brought the first weeding-out, and that by COU students were already acting like university students.

Nostalgia or evidence?

The debate is not just quantitative: it reflects a current of opinion that defends the old system as more rigorous and formative, against a present they see as dumbed down. Some bring data: the Anaya COU Philosophy book is described as "the best textbook I ever had". Others point out that even if the whole syllabus wasn't covered, the textbooks served as a reference for several years. Irony and scepticism towards educational reforms permeate the posts.


The question that remains open

Beyond the page counts, the thread leaves an uncomfortable question: is today's educational level really lower, or is it nostalgia that magnifies the past? The testimonies agree that the workload and depth were greater, but the final verdict depends on whether you prioritise the amount of knowledge or adapting to the times.

Related debates on the forum

Summary of a discussion on Burbuja.info - Foro de economía, actualidad y política., translated from Spanish and reviewed before publication. Read the full discussion (43 replies).

More summaries

All summaries in English →

-
Back