The statistical trap behind the 1966 vs 2026 myth
A comparison circulating on social media attempts to prove that Spain was a better place to live in 1966 than in 2026. The key argument: the best-selling car was a Ford Mustang, a symbol of prosperity. There is just one problem: no one in Spain bought Mustangs in the sixties. The Seat 600, the 850, the Simca 1000, and the Citroën 2CV ruled the roads – and even then, most families did not own a car.
This error is not isolated. The same graphic claims that emigration in the sixties was «very low», when more than two million Spaniards left for Germany, Switzerland, and France. It also sets the average salary in 2024 at €1,198 per year – a figure that does not withstand any scrutiny against reality: the interprofessional minimum wage already exceeds €1,000 per month over twelve payments.
But the biggest distortion lies in GDP per capita. According to the graphic, it was 30% higher in 1966 than today, at constant prices. The World Bank data it cites actually shows the opposite: $9,000 back then versus $28,000 now. The manipulation is crude: statistics from sixty years ago are taken, an arbitrary deflator is applied, and changes in income distribution, new mandatory expenses (housing, energy, private healthcare), and statistical inflation are ignored.
Behind this comparison there is no serious analysis, but an attempt to whitewash the past. Those who argue that life was better under Franco forget that Spaniards were emigrating en masse then, while today they are immigrants coming into the country. The narrative collapses as soon as real data is compared.
Related forum discussions