You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly. You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
Deagle’s 2025 Spain Population Forecast Misses by 20 Million
A website linked to Atlanticist circles predicted Spain would have 27 million people in 2025. The forecast failed, but the demographic myth persists online.
Deagle predicted 21 million fewer Spaniards for 2025
Can a website linked to the Atlanticist ecosystem erase 21 million Spaniards in a flash? That is what a prediction circulating for years claims: the website Deagle.com, which boasts clients like NATO, the CIA, the World Bank, and the UN, placed Spain at 27 million inhabitants for 2025, compared to the current 47-48 million. The same source predicted that the United States would lose 70% of its population, the United Kingdom 78%, and France 42%. Catastrophic figures that never materialized, but which continue to fuel one of the most discussed demographic theories in circles that distrust the official narrative.
What the Havoc 142 report says exactly
The document cited as support, a supposed 14-page military report dubbed "Havoc 142," describes a "trial" plan with certain human groups: the elderly, men, black people, and the poor. The text, according to those who spread it, proposes the elimination of these population segments through successive vaccination campaigns, with maximum peaks between 2021 and 2024. The central claim is that mRNA vaccines would alter DNA and leave the immune system weakened against subsequent bicho mutations. None of these claims have scientific backing: the medical community has repeated ad nauseam that messenger RNA does not alter the human genome and degrades rapidly in the body.
The 44% that never arrived
The headline figure—a Spain with 44% less population—is based on Deagle’s projection for 2025. That year has passed, and the country remains far from 27 million. There was no massive depopulation, nor in the United States, nor in the United Kingdom, nor in France. The prediction failed across the board. However, the data continues to circulate because it fits into a broader narrative: that of a demographic "great reset" driven by shadow elites. Some argue the report was never a real prediction but a leaked military analysis exercise; others point out that Deagle is a forecasting website with no verifiable rigor. Available evidence points to the latter.
Why the demographic myth persists
Demographic myths have one advantage: they cannot be fully refuted until the date passes. When the specified year arrives and nothing happens, the story is recycled with a new date. The pattern repeats since 2002, when it was predicted that by 2020 we would be diving underwater due to climate change. The crystal ball failed, but the credulity mechanism remains intact. In the Spanish case, real depopulation—the rural interior, mining basins, villages with fewer than 100 inhabitants—advances slowly and silently, without the need for secret reports. That is the paradox: while discussing an invented apocalypse, authentic demographic decline barely makes headlines.
The background noise: immigration and tension
Conversation about projected depopulation often shifts to the migration phenomenon. Some analyses suggest that population replacement will not come from a vaccine, but from sustained migration flows. This thesis circulates strongly in certain digital spaces, but mixes real data—immigration has grown in Spain in recent decades—with catastrophic projections lacking empirical basis. Spanish demographics are complex: birth rates at historic lows, high life expectancy, positive migration balances. Reducing it to a secret plan is convenient, but explains nothing.
The next time someone announces the end of the Spanish population for a specific date, it is worth checking the calendar. There have been several decades of failed prophecies. And we are still here, debating whether the next apocalypse will be in 2030 or 2040.
Summary of a discussion on Burbuja.info - Foro de economía, actualidad y política., translated from Spanish and reviewed before publication.
Read the full discussion (127 replies).