The CryptoSpain kidnapping: real robbery or a setup to evade justice?
Last Sunday, Álvaro Romillo, known as CryptoSpain, reported being kidnapped at his home in San Sebastián de los Reyes by five assailants of Colombian nationality, who tied him up, gagged him, and threatened him with a gun throughout the night. The loot: almost two million euros in cryptocurrencies, jewelry, and luxury watches. However, the victim's account—a partner of political agitator Alvise Pérez and currently charged at the Audiencia Nacional for an alleged €40 million fraud—has sparked deep skepticism among economic analysts and trinc of the crypto world.
The contradictions that sow doubt
Romillo, who had declared himself insolvent before the court handling the fraud case, claimed that the assailants accessed his rented home, a private gated community with security, without any alarm or security camera being triggered. The home lacked an operational surveillance system, something Romillo himself had repeatedly criticized in his security videos. Even more striking: the influencer was carrying a hot wallet on his phone with more than a million euros in cryptocurrencies, contradicting his own recurring advice to always use cold wallets. "He had almost 2 million there in a hot wallet app. The bald guy from CryptoSpain who was always going on about cold wallets. It's so fake it hurts," summarized an anonymous analysis online.
The assailants, according to the complaint, managed to get Romillo to transfer the funds from his phone while he was tied up. For many, this is technically complex without full access to his hands, and suggests that the wallet seeds were stored on the same device, something any expert user considers an unforgivable negligence.
The legal context: a €40 million scam
Romillo is being investigated by the Audiencia Nacional for an alleged pyramid scheme of about €40 million in which Alvise Pérez is supposedly involved. This judicial process, together with the declaration of insolvency, has led many to suspect that the kidnapping could have been a self-staged robbery to hide assets and avoid paying compensation. "He robbed himself to keep that money when the conviction comes," noted a current of opinion. The timing—the kidnapping occurred just when Romillo faced the seizure of his assets—reinforces this hypothesis.
The official account and unresolved doubts
The National Police are investigating the facts but have not yet issued conclusions. Meanwhile, Romillo's account has gaps that fuel staging theories. For example, that the assailants did not beat him despite the resistance offered, that the street door was open, and that Romillo himself had arrived from the airport hours earlier, as if knowing the assailants were waiting for him. "It smells fishy. How does he know they were Colombian if they were wearing masks? Right in the middle of a judicial process," noted another analysis.
What no data fully explains is why, with the level of exposure and prior threats Romillo claimed to have received, he did not take the minimum security measures he himself preached. The question remains: is this the last move of a scammer trying to save his assets, or was he really the victim of a violent robbery in a country where insecurity has settled into luxury gated communities?
Related debates in the forum