You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly. You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
Clases Pasivas: Spain's civil servant pension scheme closed since 2011
Clases Pasivas is the retirement scheme for Spanish civil servants who joined before 2011. Closed to new contributors, it is funded by the State budget rather than by…
Clases Pasivas: the pension scheme closed to new civil servants
What are Clases Pasivas, and why are they often described as a privilege? It is the retirement scheme for public servants who joined the Spanish Administration before 1 January 2011. From that date onwards, anyone who passes a civil service exam pays into the General Social Security scheme, like any other employee. The system is therefore closed to new contributors and destined to fade away over time.
The most common confusion is mixing up two things that only go together for long-serving civil servants. MUFACE, ISFAS and MUGEJU — the special healthcare schemes for civilians, military personnel and the judiciary — still exist and still accept new members. What was closed in 2011 was only the pension side. A civil servant who passes the exam today has MUFACE for medical care and Social Security for retirement.
Who contributes to Clases Pasivas and who does not?
It is not the scheme for all civil servants. It only covers those of the central State Administration, or those seconded by it to the autonomous regions. Municipal civil servants, regional ones and many career tracks never belonged to this system. It is a nuance that undermines the idea of a homogeneous group of privileged insiders.
Its origins are not Francoist either, as is sometimes claimed. Public employee pensions trace back to the mutual aid funds of the 18th century — the Military Fund dates from 1761, under Charles III — and the first comprehensive regulation was the 1926 Clases Pasivas Statute, under Primo de Rivera. The text applied today is the 1987 Consolidated Text of the Clases Pasivas Act, already from the democratic era.
Is it really as privileged as claimed?
Some argue it allows retirement at 60 with a full pension, paying around 150 euros more than someone who contributed the equivalent in the private sector, with no periodic reviews of permanent disability. Against this stands a technical detail: contribution bases are calculated by job group rather than actual salary. Well-paid groups such as police officers and Civil Guards contribute below what they earn and end up with low pensions. Only the A1 group contributes above the maximum base.
Who pays these pensions?
They are not funded through dedicated contributions, but directly from the State budget. For decades they were managed by the Ministry of Finance; since 2020 management has passed to the Social Security system, although it remains a separate scheme. The habilitado de Clases Pasivas was the administrator who processed and paid salaries and pensions on behalf of the recipient, an administrative figure that still survives for beneficiaries of the system.
Given this outlook, the scheme should be residual within a decade. It still breeds resentment. And it will continue to, because the story of privilege sells better than the fine print of contribution bases.
Summary of a discussion on Burbuja.info - Foro de economía, actualidad y política., translated from Spanish and reviewed before publication.
Read the full discussion (28 replies).
Spain's top advisory body criticizes the Ministry of Finance for creating legal uncertainty and altering tax regulations without parliamentary approval.
The Aldama scheme in Spain will not repay the 3 million euros in VAT fraud. Tax authorities put the real diversion at 8.2 million, but the rest has vanished in tax havens.
Jordi Évole's production company turns over 5 million euros a year, and his alleged relationship with Anna Gabriel is fueling speculation about shared interests.