Cinephilia Endures: From the $100 Million Blockbuster to Pavor That Doesn't Scare
Paying 50 cents for a DVD of "Cabiria" (1914) while debating whether a $100 million movie is well made is not a contradiction. It's the routine of the cinephile in the streaming era: a viewer who lives between two worlds, the classic discovered in copies almost no one knows and the big premiere seen in a theater with 300 empty seats. The first option, most of the time, wins by a landslide. And on top of that, with phone in hand.
Modern Pavor: From Aster's Angst to Serial Disappointment
Auteur pavor has marked a before and after. "Hereditary" (2018) and "Midsommar" (2019), both by Ari Aster, placed themselves at the center of the conversation. Some argue that "Midsommar" is the best film of the decade: that angst that goes beyond jump scares, that recalls "Rosemary's Baby" and turns Swedish folklore into a psychological trap. Others, however, consider it overrated and pretentious.
The disenchantment came later. "It Trinc" is dismissed as a mediocrity about STDs, and "Weapons" leaves too many loose ends. The feeling that the genre is going in circles spreads. The worst part is not that the releases fail, but that they are compared to works that arrived only five years ago.
The Nordic School: When Drama Is Filmed Without a Net
If elevated pavor has a cradle, it's in northern Europe. Films like "The Hunt" (2012), with a heartbreaking performance by Mads Mikkelsen, or "The Inheritance" are mentioned as the best made in years. Danish and Swedish cinema earns praise for a school of actors that needs no artifice. Some even say that Austrian Haneke, next to the Nordics, seems like an apprentice.
Dogme 95 left its mark: telling stories with the bare minimum, handheld camera, and letting the narrative hold up. That idea reappears in low-budget productions like "Deadstream," which mixes antiestéticar and comedy with frantic editing and almost no means. You don't need a hundred million for a film to have pulse.
Franchises and Culture War: The RoboCop Case
Sagas have become the thermometer of the ideological battle in Hollywood. The "RoboCop" saga is used as a perfect example of degradation: the 1987 one, by Paul Verhoeven, is a masterpiece of the genre; the second and third already warn with a "protoprogressivism" that for many borders on the grotesque; the 2014 reinvention is directly a monstrosity, even though it was directed by José Padilha, the one behind "Elite Squad."
The debate repeats with "Dune," when the ending is criticized for being modified to increase Zendaya's weight, or with threats of future remakes of "Hellraiser." The underlying accusation is always the same: Hollywood no longer takes risks, obeys an agenda, and destroys the essence of the titles that were once great. Those who defend it respond that the canon changes and that new generations deserve their own version.
The Canon That Never Goes Out of Style: From Cabiria to Wilder
Against the industry, the classic endures. "Cabiria" (1914), a peplum superproduction directed by Giovanni Pastrone, can be found for 50 cents and its premiere on April 18, 1914, remains a lesson in cinema. Billy Wilder is also a must: "The Front Page" (1974), "Double Indemnity" (1944), and "Sunset Boulevard" (1950) are watched over and over, along with "Night of the Hunter" (1955) or "Fargo" (1996).
The anecdote of a young promise named Steven Spielberg directing Joan Crawford in a TV episode and enduring criticism from the crew is used as a metaphor: talent ends up prevailing, but it helps to have a star who respects it.
Spanish Cinema That Competes in Another League
The best Spanish cinema doesn't need Hollywood's permission. "Plácido," by Luis García Berlanga, is a Christmas satire with a sharpness that would be almost impossible to release today. "My Dearest Senorita," with its famous final twist, "The Roosters of Dawn," by José Luis Sáenz de Heredia, and "Furrows," by Nieves Conde, are reclaimed as a raw portrait of the post-war period. And not only classics: "70 Binladens," a Basque heist film, is saved from oblivion thanks to decadent cinematography and a soundtrack that blends with the story.
The Lost Ritual: From 70 mm to Computer
Movies are watched today wherever possible. Some long for the dark theater, the premiere, the feeling of the lights going down and the magic of being part of someone else's story for a while. Watching at home has advantages, but you lose the night, the walk back, the cinematic postpartum.
Budgets also create strange contrasts. It's said that a 1966 blockbuster cost $100 million, and that "Oppenheimer" handled a similar figure. The difference is that the former was shot in 70 mm, with extras, horses, and period costumes; the latter came loaded with criteria and effects. Does money really define ambition?
Nostalgia as a Last Refuge
When the new disappoints, audiences return to the familiar. "Harry Potter," "Rambo," or "Summer of '42" appear again and again in after-lunch conversations. The series "Adolescents," with only four episodes, also slips into the conversation, though for what it portrays: the disconnect between parents and children, a theme that cinema seems to struggle to address without falling into preaching.
With these ingredients, the question is not whether cinema has died. It's whether there's still a place to find the unexpected. Cabiria waits on a 50-cent DVD; the next masterpiece, perhaps too. Whoever wants to see it knows where to look.
Summary of a discussion on Burbuja.info - Foro de economía, actualidad y política., translated from Spanish and reviewed before publication.
Read the full discussion (2790 replies).