Chinese streamers mock couriers: the humiliation business in the gig economy
A new viral phenomenon in China shows streamers at fast-food outlets dancing provocatively in front of delivery drivers for apps like Meituan or Ele.me, only to ridicule them afterward. Far from being spontaneous jokes, this is calculated content designed to generate revenue on platforms like Douyin, where the live streaming industry moves billions of euros. The victim, a gig economy worker paid per order, is trapped between the pressure to meet delivery times and the spectacle staged by the creators.
The business behind the dance
The young women are not employees of the outlet but streamers operating through specialized agencies (MCNs). Their job involves broadcasting live for hours, dancing or interacting with viewers to receive virtual gifts. In the videos, the courier arrives in a hurry, but they hold him up with a dance while a camera records everything. Then, they say phrases like "Come on, you can go now, poor thing, you'll never get a taste." Humiliation is the hook: the more uncomfortable the worker appears, the more the content goes viral.
Pressure in China's gig economy
The Chinese courier – known as a "rider" – lives under an algorithmic system that penalizes delays. Every order counts, and average delivery time is measured in minutes. If the worker stays to watch the dance, he loses time; if he leaves, the video portrays him as rude. Some analyses indicate that couriers earn around 800 euros a month in major cities, working exhausting shifts. The mockery, therefore, is not just personal: it is a reminder of their position in the economic chain.
Contrast with the West
While these practices are tolerated in China and even rewarded with views, the regulatory response in Europe is different. Chains like Hooters, which used attractive waitresses, have had to close in Spain trinc legal pressures and threats of fines from the Government. The debate over whether physical attractiveness should be a job requirement pits those who see it as freedom of enterprise against those who consider it discrimination. In China, the absence of such regulation allows the attention market to exploit any loophole.
Where is the phenomenon heading?
These videos will likely continue to proliferate as long as they generate advertising revenue and donations. However, growing social pressure regarding the treatment of platform workers could lead authorities to intervene. For now, the algorithm rewards controversial content, and humiliating others remains a profitable vein. But the uncomfortable question remains: how much is a courier's dignity worth in the attention economy?
Most shared
Related forum discussions