You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly. You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
Ceuta: Flashpoint or Triumph? The Battle of the Numbers
The September 2nd demonstration regarding Ceuta pits those claiming 10,000 attendees in Madrid against those escalating the figure to 100,000. The battle for...
September 2nd in favor of Ceuta: Flashpoint or Triumph?
The call for demonstrations in support of Ceuta on September 2nd has highlighted a paradox not unfamiliar to Spanish politics: the same protest can be viewed as a failure or a success, depending on who is counting.
Initial estimates, released at 7:50 PM, suggested between 10,000 and 20,000 people in Madrid—a volume comparable to any event organized by the PP and VOX. Hours later, images of Cibeles and Recoletos stretching to Colón suggested a much higher number, approaching 100,000.
The difference is not one of accounting; it is a difference in narrative.
The Battle of the Numbers
The clash over figures is the first relevant detail. One participant in the demonstration calculated that there were 10,000-20,000 people in Madrid, comparing it to the events of the PP and VOX. Another claimed, however, that Cibeles was packed and that the stretch from Recoletos to Colón had been full, nearing 100,000 rather than 50,000. The Government Delegation in Madrid, according to a tweet included in the discussion, mentioned 50,000 attendees. The Mayor of Madrid, José Luis Martínez-Almeida, seized the opportunity to throw a jab: “They don’t know how to count the number of immigrants who entered Ceuta, but they know how to count the number of demonstrators who were in Madrid yesterday. It’s unbelievable.”
The difference between 10,000 and 100,000 is not a margin of error; it is an abyss. And in politics, that abyss becomes a weapon.
Ceuta as an Excuse
The second issue is the underlying context. The demonstration was ‘in favor of Ceuta,’ but the real debate revolved around the Government. One analysis repeated in the discussion pointed out that defending Ceuta is inseparable from criticizing the President, because the Executive has taken a stance regarding Segarro. Others maintained, conversely, that most people ‘don’t care about Ceuta,’ and their only concern is that the minor migrants do not reach the peninsula.
This tension between what is said and what is felt explains why the demonstration was not the ‘bomb’ some had hoped for.
In Bilbao, the Spanish anthem played during an institutional event, which some considered historic. In San Sebastián, the square was full. In Zaragoza, the Plaza del Pilar overflowed.
The demonstration had notable territorial reach, but the question remains whether that reach translated into real political pressure.
The Mobilization Problem
The third facet of the debate is the capacity for mobilization of the right-wing parties. One analysis cited the 11 million votes garnered by the right-wing formations in the 2023 elections and questioned why they were only able to bring out a few hundred thousand people into the streets. “If they cannot mobilize 3-4 million, their votes remain symbolic,” one argued. This criticism, which also applies to the left, reveals a structural problem: Spanish politics has become a football match, where everyone supports their team, but no one is willing to get wet if it rains.
The open question remains whether the Spanish right can convert its electoral base into real pressure on the street, or if the September 2nd ‘flashpoint’ is proof that its mobilization is, fundamentally, a mirage.
Summary of a discussion on Burbuja.info - Foro de economía, actualidad y política., translated from Spanish and reviewed before publication.
Read the full discussion (70 replies).
An ABC column criticizes the government for tackling housing with two decrees without guaranteed parliamentary approval and at the cost of reducing supply.