Car stolen, then the parking fines start arriving
A resident of San Sebastián received five parking fines for his stolen car before the Ertzaintza recovered it in Legorreta.
English · Original discussion in Spanish · Published
Five fines for a stolen car: a tale of administrative absurdity
On 22 November, Julio A.'s car was parked in his garage space in an apartment building in San Sebastián, Spain. The next day, it was gone. The owner reported the theft to the Ertzaintza (the Basque regional police) the same day. Twenty-four days later, on 17 December, the regional police intercepted the vehicle in Legorreta, with an occupant inside. The problem: during those nearly four weeks, the rightful owner received five parking fines in two different towns. It's no joke: it's the result of the fine-issuing systems and the stolen vehicle recovery systems not talking to each other.
The OTA fined a car listed as stolen five times
The most striking thing is not that the car was badly parked, but that OTA (San Sebastián's parking enforcement agency) officers located it five times to issue fines. Each fine means an inspector approached the vehicle, checked its number plate and issued the ticket. Not one of them cross-checked that plate against the stolen vehicle database. Neither did the local police of the two towns involved. The result: the penalty system worked perfectly for collecting money, but was useless for recovering the car.
Administrations that don't talk to each other: the underlying problem
The case highlights administrative fragmentation: parking inspectors answer to the city council, the local police to the town hall, and the theft investigation falls to the regional or national police. Each force has its own priorities and, above all, its own revenue targets. The fine is automatic; the coordination is not. The owner had to appeal all five fines with the theft report, a process that can drag on for months and may even require going through the administrative courts. Meanwhile, the vehicle was recovered by the Ertzaintza in Legorreta, but only after an occupant was caught inside.
How long would it take to recover stolen cars if every parking fine came with an automatic check of the vehicle's status? The question is not technical: it's one of administrative will. In the meantime, all the owner can do is appeal, wait and pay the lawyer.
On 22 November, Julio A.'s car was parked in his garage space in an apartment building in San Sebastián, Spain. The next day, it was gone. The owner reported the theft to the Ertzaintza (the Basque regional police) the same day. Twenty-four days later, on 17 December, the regional police intercepted the vehicle in Legorreta, with an occupant inside. The problem: during those nearly four weeks, the rightful owner received five parking fines in two different towns. It's no joke: it's the result of the fine-issuing systems and the stolen vehicle recovery systems not talking to each other.
The OTA fined a car listed as stolen five times
The most striking thing is not that the car was badly parked, but that OTA (San Sebastián's parking enforcement agency) officers located it five times to issue fines. Each fine means an inspector approached the vehicle, checked its number plate and issued the ticket. Not one of them cross-checked that plate against the stolen vehicle database. Neither did the local police of the two towns involved. The result: the penalty system worked perfectly for collecting money, but was useless for recovering the car.
Administrations that don't talk to each other: the underlying problem
The case highlights administrative fragmentation: parking inspectors answer to the city council, the local police to the town hall, and the theft investigation falls to the regional or national police. Each force has its own priorities and, above all, its own revenue targets. The fine is automatic; the coordination is not. The owner had to appeal all five fines with the theft report, a process that can drag on for months and may even require going through the administrative courts. Meanwhile, the vehicle was recovered by the Ertzaintza in Legorreta, but only after an occupant was caught inside.
How long would it take to recover stolen cars if every parking fine came with an automatic check of the vehicle's status? The question is not technical: it's one of administrative will. In the meantime, all the owner can do is appeal, wait and pay the lawyer.
Also available in: Deutsch
Summary of a discussion on Burbuja.info - Foro de economía, actualidad y política., translated from Spanish and reviewed before publication. Read the full discussion (39 replies).
More summaries
-
Madrid municipal police find 600 kilos of cocaine after chasing a suspicious car
Madrid's municipal police seized 600 kilos of cocaine after a chase in Vallecas, Spain. We look at the details and the questions surrounding the operation.
-
Ayuso Criticizes La Sexta Over Grandfather's Past
La Sexta Columna report on Ayuso's grandfather as Falange leader sparks controversy over politicians' family histories.
-
“Gays rule over us”: homophobia as a political weapon
The question “do gays rule over us” hides a classic move: using sexual orientation as a political weapon to delegitimize. An analysis.
-
Neighbours beat suspected thief in Spain: justice or mob attack?
A video of neighbours beating a suspected thief in Spain has divided opinion: citizen justice or staged scene? We examine the clues.
-
Carla Galeote claims speeding with your partner is sexism
Content creator Carla Galeote says accelerating while driving with your partner is a form of sexism. The video has sparked mixed reactions, from support to personal criticism.
-
The Romani genetic legacy in non-Romani Spaniards
Centuries of coexistence between Romani and non-Romani people in Spain left a genetic footprint that some put at up to 15%. History and genetics point to a…