Booking or the hotel's own website: when booking costs more

Booking's commission to hotels runs from 15% to 25%. Chains usually match the price; for independent hotels, it all depends on the contract.

English · Original discussion in Spanish · Published

Booking or the hotel's own website: when booking costs more
Booking is not always more expensive than the hotel's own website

There is no general rule. Anyone expecting a binary answer like "yes Booking" or "no Booking" will be left wanting, because the final price depends on the contract between the platform and each property, and on the commission the former takes. That commission ranges, according to figures circulating in the industry, between 15% and 25% of the booking amount, depending on the contract signed and the visibility the hotel purchases within the search engine.

From there, the map splits. And the conclusions change depending on the type of accommodation you call.

Large chains: the price matches or beats it

At chain hotels the trend is for the price on their own website to match or beat Booking's. They have loyalty programmes, they want the customer in their database, and they have no interest in handing margin to an intermediary. There, calling or booking through the official website usually works out better. Not always, but usually.

Independent hotels: no man's land

At small and mid-sized properties the outcome is unpredictable. Some will match the price if you mention the rate seen on the platform, while others reply that "it is what it is", assuming the customer has already been funnelled in by the search engine. In establishments with corporate clients and long stays, a short stay booked through the platform can be marginal to them: it does not interest the business and they will not fight for it.

Exclusive rates: when Booking does win

The platform offers rates the hotel cannot offer on its own: prices for registered users, app-only discounts or non-refundable rates. There is nothing to be gained there. The hotel cannot match what it is contractually not allowed to publish.

The clause that existed and then didn't

For years, Booking's contracts included a parity clause under which the hotel could not offer lower prices on its own website than on the platform. If it did, it faced penalties or removal. The way out many properties found was to keep the room rate identical and shift the difference to extras: breakfast included, free parking, a room with a view. In other words, same price, more value. That clause was later amended, and since then the hotel's own website is often slightly cheaper. Often, not always.

How to check without wasting your afternoon

The method most often repeated is simple: search for the property on the platform, then locate it on a map and compare there the prices offered by the different agencies, wholesalers and the hotel's own website. Nothing more is needed. One specific case mentioned: a booking in Hungary came out cheaper on Booking than on the property's official website. The opposite case also appears: someone who books several hotel nights a month says that, in their experience, the hotel's own site wins.

The full calculation, with the margins by type of property and the effect of exclusive rates, is where the answer is truly decided. And there is no shortcut.

Is it worth spending ten minutes comparing every time? It depends on how much you value your time versus your wallet.

Also available in: Deutsch

Summary of a discussion on Burbuja.info - Foro de economía, actualidad y política., translated from Spanish and reviewed before publication. Read the full discussion (32 replies).

More summaries

All summaries in English →

-
Back