Blame Shifts to Female Vote After Accusations of Male Cowardice

Gender voting gap cited as cause of Spain's decline

One message. No sources. A list of grievances and a conclusion: Spanish men are cowards who have allowed everything. The text distributes anger among specific groups — mentioning two million flamenco dancers, five million trinc of a religious confession, and more than six million people across the Atlantic — and closes with total contempt for anyone recognizing themselves in that portrait. It cites not a single report. No one provides verifiable statistics. And here lies the paradox: many responses accept the diagnosis but change the accused.

What the initial message exactly reproaches

The approach is an accumulation of grievances. Spanish men are accused of tolerating an "illegal three-month lockdown," complaining only in minor digital spaces, allowing pensions to double a salary of €1,200, and letting politicians ignore them while they keep voting. To this are added two gender-based reproaches: that their sons grow up without character or engage in prostitution, and that Spanish women feel rejection toward them. All these claims are launched without documentary support; they are opinions, not data. The comparison of €1,200 monthly wages with pensions that would double that figure works as a slogan, not as a statistical series.

The voting gap, turned into a scapegoat

The most repeated thesis in replies holds that the fault lies not with men, but with the female vote. It is argued that women voted overwhelmingly for the left — mentioning PSOE and former presidents Felipe González, José Luis Rodríguez Zapatero, and current president Pedro Sánchez — and that without that support, none of the enumerated issues would have occurred. Some formulations are blunt: if only men voted in Spain, this situation would not exist. The argument suffers from problems of electoral arithmetic and logic: it attributes decisions dependent on parliamentary majorities, coalitions, and economic contexts to a homogeneous block of voters. No one shows the breakdown supporting this.

"Better a conservative dictatorship": disenchantment with the system

In parallel emerges a less conjunctural current: distrust towards democracy itself. Some argue that an authoritarian regime of conservative sign would be preferable to daily precarity, adding a condition — the representative system would only work with educated and discerning voters, something considered lost. This is not new: the idea that the electoral mechanism produces bad governments because it produces bad voters reappears whenever the economy tightens. What is striking here is the packaging, presented as technical diagnosis rather than nostalgia.

€1,200, double pensions, and fiscal reproach

The economic axis of the anger is recognizable: salaries of €1,200 for which people "kill themselves" and benefits that, according to the same reproach, would reach double that amount. The comparison between a pension doubling a low salary and the salary itself mixes two different things: the amount of a specific benefit and the purchasing power of a precarious paycheck. Added to this is the reproach of paying taxes, described as theft. This is the terrain where anger has less to do with gender and more with the structure of the Spanish labor market.

The narrative of the failed 2020 protest

One of the most concrete passages involves someone who, in 2020, attended a demonstration against mandatory mask use expecting to find a group willing to clash. They claim to have been left alone — attendees wore muzzles (cubreboca) — and that about ten officers surrounded them with warnings about disobedience; they appealed and won. From this they extract an organizational lesson: calls are made on Saturday at noon, when there is no one to inconvenience, instead of Monday at coffee time, in front of those who decide. The conclusion of this narrative is not epic, but logistical.

The third path: neither pogre nor conservatives

To the dispute adds a current rejecting the previous two, presenting them as faces of the same coin: two pendulums of power alternating without changing anything. Those defending this claim the dissidence of the 2000s decade, stating it was erased from recent history through closed digital spaces, deleted pages, and exemplary arrests. It is the hardest thesis to verify and the one providing the least data, but helps understand the underlying tone: people who identify neither with the establishment nor with classic opposition.

The figure of 2,000 deaths and mention of DANA

Among the final reproaches appears one that is not developed: that more than 2,000 compatriots have died while reaction is limited to complaints. The figure is launched without specifying which event it refers to or providing any source, and in the thread, the DANA (severe storm) and Valencians are mentioned in separate messages, without being linked to that figure. The issue remains open, without data backing it or reply discussing it. Another current projects anger into the future, placing between 2024 and 2028 an offensive by Hispanicist globalism in America, a framework based on geopolitical interpretation and no verifiable document.

---

It remains to be seen whether the malaise sustaining these messages — precarity, public services, salaries — will someday channel into something other than a list of crossed reproaches. For now, the figure anchoring the anger is the €1,200 salary. Why that one and not others?