Audio attributed to a non-commissioned officer about training with deceased soldiers

Audio attributed to a non-commissioned officer describes maneuver with dead soldiers

Boots, uniform, backpack, helmet, and likely rifle, according to a participant's description. A reservoir with water below 10 degrees, near nightfall, and muddy at the bottom. This scene forms the backdrop of an audio attributed to a unit's non-commissioned officer, which has reignited the case of soldiers who died during military exercises. The recording mentions three fatalities; other versions reduce the number to two dead and one missing. The discrepancy remains unresolved.

What the attributed audio says and the role of the lifeline

The recording uses specialized vocabulary: lifeline, wading, ropes. This detail has lent credibility to the content for some, although its authenticity is debated. Some detect a manipulated voice, while others find no reason to doubt the account. What's relevant is the cross-reference with press reports: according to that version, the soldiers did have a lifeline, but the ropes broke, something some participants question. The audio, however, suggests an exercise planned without such protection.

Therein lies the crux. As one participant points out, if the objective was to wade through an area where one cannot stand, the discussion shifts from military to incivil territory. Another argues that commanders know the terrain and the troops' physical condition, and calculating both rests on them.

The weight of the gear and the cold water

Some participants' calculation is simple. The full gear weighs between 20 and 30 kilos dry; considerably more when wet, as clothing absorbs water and the dead weight skyrockets. With boots and a saturated backpack, buoyancy disappears. Add to this water below 10 degrees and the silt at the bottom, which, according to those who have dived in reservoirs, acts almost like quicksand and sucks down anyone trying to stand.

As a participant explains, the cold shock comes before drowning: the skin is hit by cold suddenly, heart rate spikes, and breathing becomes uncontrolled. Within those few seconds, the chances of not getting out are already high. And if the gear is carried in the hands, the question is how one swims.

Is it acceptable to die in military training?

Here, any consensus breaks down. One view holds that risk is part of the job: if you're trained for combat, you also accept that an exercise might kill you. Conversely, some argue that training is not combat, and in peacetime, safety is the priority; for them, drowning in a puddle is not an honorable death but a miscalculation.

The debate has intensified with a comparison, brought up by a participant, to elite units, where the toughest tests are first rehearsed with the instructors themselves to verify they are surmountable and the margin for accidents is minimal.

Who is responsible and what is antiestéticared

The focus is on the company commander, who, according to a participant, has already been removed. Some anticipate that administrative details that may seem minor—the ambulance, medical support, the expiry date of a rope—will be reviewed, and that in a disciplinary procedure, they weigh as much as the account of events.

A precedent looms over the case: that of Legionario Cruz, and the antiestéticar, expressed in the thread, that, as then, the casualties will be accepted without question and responsibilities will be diluted.

---

The salary mentioned by a participant for those who entered the water that night is around 1,200 euros. For some, this is the detail that least fits any discourse on military honor.