Blue dollar dips below official rate: end of Argentina's currency gap
The blue dollar started trading below the official rate, selling at 1040. This news, spreading on social media, sparked debate over whether closing the exchange rate gap validates Milei’s economic plan or is merely a temporary mirage. The parallel market, long considered the true pulse of Argentina's economy, now trades below the official rate, an anomaly many call historic while others attribute it to manipulation of the official price.
The data point that breaks the narrative
For years, the blue dollar was the thermometer of distrust. Its price reflected the value Argentines assigned to their currency when the government set an artificially low official rate. Now, this same parallel market sells at 1040, below the official rate. The exchange rate gap, which once exceeded 100%, has closed. Government supporters see this as proof the adjustment works: "no capital controls are needed anymore," they argue. Skeptics claim the official rate remains artificially fixed and parity only reflects the blue dollar's collapse due to lack of demand.
The crawling peg, involving continuous devaluation of the peso, remains in place. Some argue that eliminating it could cause inflation to drop to 0%. Others warn that without this mechanism, the official rate would appreciate in real terms, hurting export competitiveness. The debate is significant: Argentina has spent decades alternating between fixed rates that break down and uncontrolled floats.
What peine to the blue dollar?
The blue dollar has ceased to be a safe haven for savers. With the official rate higher, buying in the parallel market makes no sense. Demand has dried up. This explains the parity: the peso hasn't strengthened; rather, the blue dollar has lost its function. Those operating informally now find better prices in the formal market, reducing pressure on the parallel sector.
The immediate consequence is that the government can claim to have unified the exchange rate without a traumatic devaluation. The medium-term outcome is less clear. If the official rate stays above the blue dollar, the Central Bank must support that price with reserves. In Argentina, reserves have always been a finite resource.
The adjustment no one wants to acknowledge
The debate quickly shifts to public spending. The "chainsaw," the indiscriminate cuts Milei applied upon taking office, reduced the deficit. Plan defenders present this as proof that Argentina's problem was never a lack of resources, but excessive spending. "They said there was no money, but there is money as soon as they stop stealing it," summarizes a frequently repeated quote attributed to Bukele.
Critics note the adjustment had a social cost. Poverty, which the government inherited at around 49%, has remained at similar levels according to official figures. The argument that the country is heading toward sustained poverty reduction clashes with the slowness of improvement. Real wages take time to recover, and domestic consumption remains depressed.
The IMF shadow and investor return
The next chapter plays out in Washington. Some believe capital controls could be lifted in the first quarter of 2025 if IMF funds accelerate and Argentina regains investment grade. It is a risky bet. The IMF has not yet disbursed most of the program, and conditions remain demanding.
Meanwhile, markets celebrate the drop in country risk. Argentina pays less for its debt than a year ago, a change some describe as staggering. Comparisons with Spain enter the conversation: if the country reduces its risk premium below Spain's, the symbolism would be hard to digest for many.
The model dividing economists
The Argentine experiment has no recent precedents. A government applying a liberal program in a country burdened by decades of interventionism. Removing import taxes, deregulating taxis, or using AI to shrink the state are pieces of the same puzzle. Defenders view it as a vaccine against populism: once Argentines see it works, they will vote similarly even if Milei leaves.
Critics warn the model depends on political stability. Argentina faces elections in 2025, and Peronism remains a competitive force. If the adjustment doesn't translate into visible improvements before the polls, the shift could reverse. Argentine history is full of reforms that began with enthusiasm and ended in oblivion.
The blue dollar falling below the official rate is a fact. What remains unclear is whether it certifies the end of the gap or just the end of blue dollar demand. With the crawling peg intact and reserves under watch, exchange rate parity is a fragile equilibrium. Markets may test it soon.
Summary of a discussion on Burbuja.info - Foro de economía, actualidad y política., translated from Spanish and reviewed before publication.
Read the full discussion (171 replies).
Milei calls wokeness a 'sinister agenda' at Davos, reopening debate on Argentina's Central Bank amid agricultural data and criticism of the money printer.