Are there still PEPEROS in the forum?

VOX Ceuta announces on X a proposal to use the money of Ceuta's residents to address the consequences of irregular migration and cut the funding used to support migrants. According to that message, the PP voted against it; the question accompanying it assumes the party refused to guarantee safety in the neighbourhoods.

## What VOX Ceuta announces

The party **VOX Ceuta** published a message on X claiming it had proposed using the money of Ceuta's residents to address the consequences of what the text calls an "invasion", and to cut the funding used to support migrants. It ends with a question from **Redondo Pacheco**: "What exactly did they vote no to? Guaranteeing safety in our neighbourhoods?".

The message does not specify which institution held the vote, the amount of the funding affected, or which people it refers to. It is a partisan claim.

## The PP, according to that message

It claims that the **Partido Popular** (Spain's conservative People's Party) voted against the proposal. The piece provides no document, minutes or figures to back this up, so the claim should be read for what it is: a version circulated by VOX. The final question is an interpretation of that vote, not a verified fact.

## Why Ceuta is the setting

**Ceuta** is a Spanish autonomous city on the North African coast, with a land border with **Segarro**. Care for migrants and pressure at the border crossing have dominated local political debate for years. **VOX** has placed immigration at the centre of its programme.