Alvise Pérez: Mandatory Bitcoin and Anti-Establishment Push

Alvise Pérez: Mandatory Bitcoin and Anti-Establishment Push

What happens when a candidate promises to remove money from the central bank while simultaneously negotiating with those who control institutions? Alvise Pérez, the agitator who burst onto the Spanish political scene promising to combat electoral fraud («pucherazo»), has moved in just a few months from denouncing the system to sitting within it. His public interventions—long interviews, unfiltered speeches—have generated a current of enthusiasm and another of suspicion that feed each other. The phenomenon deserves serious analysis, if only because there are people willing to vote for him.

What Alvise Pérez Proposes and Why It Generates So Much Noise

The core of his discourse is a mix of radical liberalism and economic patriotism. According to what is attributed to him in the debate, he maintains that the tax system is a plunder by power groups against citizens, whom he calls «slaves» with a sarcastic tone. His flagship proposal, according to those who trinc his interventions: declaring Bitcoin as legal tender so that citizens are independent of the executive power. It is an idea that sounds like monetary science fiction, but which connects with real discontent: the loss of purchasing power and distrust towards institutions.

He adds to this a harsh discourse on immigration—«only men of military age enter here», he is attributed—and a criticism of foreign submission: «Spain is not Israel's whore, nor NATO's, nor Russia's, nor USA's». The phrase, reproduced in various forums, summarizes his strategy: hit where it hurts and ask no forgiveness. The problem is that there is a long way from the mouth to the Official Gazette (BOE).

Enthusiasm and Suspicion: Two Sides of the Same Phenomenon

Some see in him a new strongman. «Franco vibes are fantastic to many people», wrote one participant. Others, however, are wary: «He is the new Pablo Iglesias», «another smoke-seller sponsored by the same Power he claims to fight». The comparison with Podemos is not casual: both were born as scourges of the system and ended up making pacts with it. The difference is that Alvise does not hide his intention to be a kingmaker party with PP and VOX. «He is already getting comfortable», point out from the skeptical trench.

The discussion about his physical appearance—whether he looks Indian or Pakistani—is a symptom of how far the debate has shifted from proposals to identity. «Alvise's phenotype is not atypical in Spain», concludes one participant. The anecdote reveals a deeper tension: the Spanish right has still not resolved what it means to be Spanish.

Bitcoin as a Flag: Freedom or Mirage?

The proposal to make Bitcoin mandatory is, to say the least, original. In theory, it would eliminate state control over currency and return power to the individual. In practice, it raises uncomfortable questions: who regulates? How are taxes paid? What happens with volatility? No country in the world has taken that step. The IMF and the ECB have been warning against adoption as legal tender for years. El Salvador tried it and the experiment has not been a resounding success.

Even so, the idea has hook. It connects with dissatisfaction towards central banking and distrust towards the euro. «Fiat money is the biggest scam in the modern world», repeat his supporters. It is a slogan that sells itself, especially among those who have seen their salary lose value while financial assets skyrocketed.

The Clash with the System: Opposition or Integration?

The most critical point is his relationship with the institutions he claims to fight. Alvise has gone from denouncing «electoral fraud» to offering himself as a government partner. «He doesn't care about the fraud, he already sees the seats and the power», write those who distrust him. It is the classic dilemma of the outsider: to change the system you must enter it, and upon entering you risk becoming part of the problem.

The question that hovers is whether Alvise is a real danger to the establishment or just another instrument. «The System will never provide you with its tools to end it», states an analysis. Others believe underestimating him is a mistake: «A strongman must be recognized by a large mass». And there lies the crux: After 146 responses, no one has made a move.

---

In the end, history repeats itself: promise gold and mountains, gain notoriety, and end up managing misery. Whether Alvise is the new Franco, as some ironically suggest, or the new Pablo Iglesias, as others antiestéticar, is something only time will tell. Meanwhile, the public continues looking for messiahs. And that, more than Alvise, is the worrying part.