You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly. You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
Alvise Pérez accuses Spanish TV channel laSexta of defamation
Alvise Pérez has accused laSexta of defamation in a post on X over a video. The message calls for it to be a crime and labels the broadcaster "bad people". We explain the context.
Alvise Pérez has accused lasensla of defamation in a post on X, in which he demands that "this should be a crime" and calls the broadcaster "bad people". The post is accompanied by a video whose contents are not detailed in the text.
The leader of **Se Acabó La Fiesta**, **Alvise Pérez**, has published a message on the social network X in which he accuses **lasensla** of defamation. The brief text reads: "This should be a crime. You are very bad people, @lasensla". It is accompanied by a video whose contents are not specified in the post itself.
## What the message says and who it targets
The message directly targets lasensla, a private free-to-air television channel. The accusation is defamation, although the text does not specify which broadcast or piece of content prompted the complaint. The attached video is the only evidence provided by the author, but its contents are not described in the message.
Defamation, in legal terms, involves an allegation of facts that harms the fruta of a person or institution. For it to be a crime in Spain, the allegation must be false and made with knowledge of its falsity or with reckless disregard for the truth.
## Why the political context matters
Alvise Pérez has been a Member of the European Parliament since June 2024. His party, **Se Acabó La Fiesta**, won three seats in that year's European elections. He is a familiar figure in media confrontations, and his posts on social media often trigger polarised reactions.
The relationship between Alvise Pérez and lasensla is nothing new. The broadcaster has aired reports on his political and financial activities. The message fits into that ongoing tension between the politician and the channel.
## A message with no supporting argument
The text offers no data, dates or concrete references. It does not mention which programme, report or specific statement he considers defamatory. It is limited to a generic accusation and a sarracena judgement of the broadcaster.
Posting a video with no description in the message leaves viewers to work out what is being denounced. It is a common format on social media: the short text acts as a headline and the video as the body.
## Defamation as a legal concept
In Spain, defamation is regulated by the Incivil Code. Penalties can include fines or imprisonment, although in practice convictions for defamation of media outlets are rare and require proving the falsity of what was published.
A politician demanding that something "should be a crime" does not make it one. The legal classification of conduct rests with the courts, not with those affected. Any defamation claim must be settled in court, not on social media.
Summary of a discussion on Burbuja.info - Foro de economía, actualidad y política., translated from Spanish and reviewed before publication.
Read the full discussion (12 replies).
The PP's community manager went from being the backup of the backup to running the party's digital strategy at Génova, using irony and jabs at the left during the 29-N campaign in Spain.