The sanitary cordon against Alternative for Germany (AfD) is cracking. In the country's most populous region, North Rhine-Westphalia, the party has tripled its electoral results, according to data held by the formation. In Thuringia, Alice Weidel's party has become the most voted force, a result German press dismisses with the usual manual: far-right, Eurosceptic, and pro-Russian. Scholz's SPD falls to a historic low of 7%, while Greens and Liberals are kept out of parliament in some polls. The two-party coalition hides over 81 billion euros in public debt, AfD accuses. And the establishment responds with what it knows best: protests to ban the rival and threats to intervene in governments using constitutional mechanisms never before used.
The Collapse of SPD and the Void It Leaves
The figure that best summarizes the debacle is that of the SPD: a historic low of 7%, with the Greens and FDP out of parliament. It is not a bad Tuesday for elections. It is the confirmation that the NATO-aligned socialism that has governed Germany for years is decomposing. The coalition supporting Scholz is unraveling on three fronts: expensive energy, uncontrolled immigration, and a war Germany funds without debating publicly.
Some argue that the German voter is punishing submission to foreign interests. The argument has traction: since the Nord Stream explosion, German industry has lost cheap Russian gas and gained unpayable bills. Weidel promises to restart the pipeline if she wins. It is an electoral promise, not a consummated fact, but it moves votes.
The problem for the CDU is that its natural alternative—pacting with SPD and Greens—seems increasingly improbable. A tripartite government would strip away all masks at once. And if it falls, AfD picks up the pieces in the next electoral call.
Why Do AfD Candidates Die Mid-Campaign?
Six AfD candidates have died under strange circumstances during the North Rhine-Westphalia campaign, according to published reports. Four first, then six. The coincidence is statistically uncomfortable and fuels all kinds of readings. There is no official conclusion explaining the pattern.
In Ludwigshafen, participation plummeted after the exclusion of the AfD candidate. The sequence—exclusion, collapse of participation, result without the uncomfortable rival—delineates a pattern that some read as democracy in action and others as electoral engineering. The CDU has threatened to intervene in an AfD government using a constitutional mechanism never used in Germany. AfD already presides for the first time over a land parliament: "We have broken the sanitary cordon," they celebrate.
The Institutional Standoff: Banning the Winner
In Frankfurt, a spontaneous demonstration has filled the streets demanding the banning of AfD. The scene has its logic: when you cannot win at the ballot box, you try to win in the courts. The problem is that banning a party that triples results in the country's most populous region does not strengthen democracy; it questions it.
The circulating argument is that Brussels already did so in Romania, is trying with Orbán and Fico, and will soon attempt it with Vox or the National Front. The comparison to a Sicilian-style mafia is exaggerated, but the sequence of events—sanitary cordon, candidate exclusions, threats of constitutional intervention—does not invite optimism.
The Pipeline, Treats, and Remigration
AfD distributes bags of candy shaped like airplanes outside schools and institutes. The message is explicit: remigration, mass deportations of illegal immigrants. Weidel announces she will do what Trump did: border protection decrees on day one. It is propaganda, not public policy, but it connects with an electorate that has watched for years as the immigration debate is managed from above without consulting them.
The underlying calculation is simple: if socialism disappears across Europe except in Spain, Germany becomes the European reception center. The statement is partial, but the figure of SPD at 7% gives it plausibility.
There remains the exact point where the analysis stalls: AfD wins, but cannot govern. The CDU does not pact, the cordon holds for now, and the system seeks formulas to avoid handing power to the winner. Will the people be allowed to decide this time? The question has no answer in the data.
Summary of a discussion on Burbuja.info - Foro de economía, actualidad y política., translated from Spanish and reviewed before publication.
Read the full discussion (301 replies).