Adif removed 42 metres of track from Adamuz crash site without court approval

Spain's rail operator Adif removed 42 metres of track from the Adamuz crash site without a court order. Minister Óscar Puente faces three years in prison for covering up evidence.

English · Original discussion in Spanish · Published

Adif removed 42 metres of track from the Adamuz crash site without court approval

Adif, Spain's state-owned rail infrastructure operator, removed 42 metres of track from the site of the Adamuz rail accident overnight without judicial authorisation, an action that has landed Transport Minister Óscar Puente in the dock facing three years in prison for covering up a crime. The events, which took place in March 2026, have triggered a political and judicial storm, with accusations of evidence destruction affecting the investigation into the rail disaster that claimed several lives.

The facts: an overnight removal with no legal cover

According to reports in El Mundo and ABC, in the early hours of 20 March 2026, Adif workers arrived at the accident site, which had been sealed off by the judicial police, and removed 42 metres of track. The action was carried out without the required court authorisation and, according to internal sources, on an urgent basis. Days later, the investigating judge ordered the Guardia Civil (Spanish Civil Guard) to investigate whether the replaced rail, which had shown cracks as early as 2019, could have caused the derailment.

The incivil consequences: Óscar Puente in the spotlight

The Public Prosecutor's Office has peine proceedings against Transport Minister Óscar Puente, who is credited with ordering the removal of the tracks. Outlets such as La Gaceta and Libertad Digital report that Puente faces a request for three years in prison for concealment of a crime. Puente himself has responded by accusing the UDEF (Spain's economic and financial crime police unit) of "ridiculous and absurd speculation", in an attempt to divert attention. However, internal Adif emails, uncovered by La Razón, show the urgency: "We need to get it off the track urgently!", wrote a manager.

A repeating pattern: from the power grid to the railways

This is not an isolated case. Weeks later, Red Eléctrica asked the judge to withhold from Iberdrola and Endesa the recordings from its control centres on the day of the blackout. The coincidence of conduct has led several analysts to speak of a systematic "modus operandi" of evidence concealment by public entities. In the Adamuz case, moreover, it has come to light that Adif ignored a prevention plan required by Brussels, which aggravates the political and administrative responsibility.

The question that remains unanswered

Despite the documentary evidence and the confession of an Adif manager to the Guardia Civil, the Government has offered no convincing explanation. The question no analysis can resolve is whether the removal of the tracks was an act of bureaucratic incompetence or a deliberate manoeuvre to hide a maintenance defect that may have caused the tragedy. Meanwhile, the victims' families and public opinion await justice being served without the privileges that usually protect senior officials.


Related discussions in the forum

Also available in: Deutsch

Summary of a discussion on Burbuja.info - Foro de economía, actualidad y política., translated from Spanish and reviewed before publication. Read the full discussion (51 replies).

More summaries

All summaries in English →

-
Back