Abascal fake video row and the battle for the VOX vote

The Abascal fake video and the battle for the VOX vote

A manipulated video of Santiago Abascal has spread like wildfire among those seeking to undermine his support. In the edited version, the VOX leader appears to say he does not care how many immigrants there are; in the full interview, according to those who have reviewed it, the quote is exactly the opposite: "I don't care if it's a hundred thousand or a million we're going to kick out." The anecdote serves to illustrate a broader phenomenon being hotly debated these days: the suspicion that part of the public debate is designed to demobilize the VOX vote ahead of the next elections.

Manipulation as an electoral weapon

The video episode is not an isolated case. The exchange describes a repeated strategy: instead of rebutting VOX's discourse with arguments, it is accused of being soft, of controlled dissent, or of being no different from the PP (Spain's mainstream conservative party). The aim, according to this thesis, is not to convince anyone, but to convince potential voters that voting is not worth it. "It wasn't about convincing anyone, but about demobilizing their vote," sums up one of the most upvoted messages. The technique has a name in the jargon: fabricating a lukewarm version so the original seems dispensable.

The tactical voting calculation and the D'Hondt law

The economic core of the matter lies in the electoral law. Some argue the goal of these maneuvers is to keep VOX below 20% so it does not get catapulted by the D'Hondt law. The figure is no accident: in a corrected proportional system, seats skyrocket when a party surpasses a certain threshold. That is why tactical voting becomes the battleground. Some argue that voting VOX is the only real option to remove Sánchez; others reply that voting for the "lesser evil" only keeps the wheel of "memocracy" turning, as it is written with a wink in the thread.

Distrust of the PP and the specter of abstention

The discussion soon drifts toward the PP. The comparison with 2011, when Rajoy's absolute majority failed to dismantle what his voters expected, hangs over the exchange. "Voting for the lesser evil is NOT the solution," one message declares. Against that, the opposite thesis gains ground: any excuse will do to avoid voting VOX and leave Sánchez in power. Underneath lies the question of whether tactical voting is an instrument of change or a trap with no way out.

The Israel factor and international alliances

The conversation gets tangled up with VOX's support for Israel. One message sums it up wryly: "I'm going to vote for them precisely because they side with Israel." The irony hides a deeper debate about geopolitical alliances and Spain's role in the new world order. For some, the real threat comes not from immigration, but from a pro-Semitic ambush cutting across left and right. It is an unexpected twist that adds layers to the discussion.

Disenchantment and the temptation to abstain

Not everyone taking part is convinced. Some confess to having insulted VOX for years and now consider voting for them as an "imbecilic" gesture so as not to feel guilty. The phrase, halfway between self-criticism and humor, portrays a voter who does not believe in the system but antiestéticars passivity. In this context, abstention stops being a neutral option and becomes an involuntary vote for the adversary.

---

In the end, the figure that unsettles is not the manipulated video, but the number repeated like a mantra: if VOX surpasses 20%, the board changes. And it is there, at that threshold, that the real battle is fought.