You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly. You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
A Forum User: Donating Two Million to a Son "For Free" in Cantabria
A forum user claims that donating between one and two million euros to a son in Cantabria is tax-exempt and can be completed without a notary; the parents retain usufruct.
Donating two million to children costs zero euros in Cantabria
Transferring assets to a child can cost zero euros. According to one forum user, in Cantabria the gift tax for descendants is subsidized and the process doesn't require going to a notary: it can be finalized at the bank. Based on this, there is a case involving a sum that makes a difference: between one and two million euros delivered in a single transaction. The nuance he points out is that the money doesn't truly change hands: the parents retain control over it until one passes away.
How much does it cost to donate money to a son in Cantabria
In the thread, the tax matter is based on the forum user's account: according to him, in Cantabria, the gift tax for descendants can be settled without paying anything, and another participant estimates that the inheritance tax benefit is nearly 99%.
That is the first hook of the matter. If donating is free today and inheriting will be almost free tomorrow, what do you gain by moving papers? The answer is not immediate savings. It is security.
Bare ownership and lifetime usufruct: what is actually donated
The arrangement described is the donation of bare ownership of the money, with the donor reserving lifetime usufruct. Translated: title is transferred, but the donor retains the right to use and enjoy it. Regarding fungible goods —and cash is— this usufruct becomes a quasi-usufruct, and the holder can continue spending, investing, or disposing of the amounts.
There is no technical consensus behind the scenes. One current holds that this fits the donation model; another argues that a donation might carry an usufruct, criticizing the setup as wishful thinking because if the donor can spend it all, the bare ownership would be worth zero upon their death. This is a controversy that remains unresolved for now.
Freezing inheritance tax: the underlying reason
Beyond the cash, what is purchased is tax time. By donating and settling today, the operation is resolved under current law and protected against future reforms. Those who antiestéticar that inheritance will become expensive arrange the papers before the law changes, not afterward.
The risk lies on the other side of the table. If the child passes away before the parents, that reversal is a swamp: they would inherit their own money, subject to their own inheritance tax.
And real estate multiplies the move: the account mentions a family property in Comillas and a rental urban property leased for almost nothing to a relative, on a site its owner describes as prime.
Why many doubt the operation is real
Skepticism arises quickly. For a transaction of that magnitude to be discussed publicly, with town names and round figures, activates anyone's smoke detector. Some recall that donating money requires paying tax even if it is zero, and others believe the account is simply an exaggeration.
There is also the emotional flip side. Several messages celebrate the gesture more than the money: parents arranging their inheritance while alive so that the child does not inherit a problem. Others, however, point out that current conditions push older generations to support those under 45, and not always generously.
The forum user maintains that the operation serves to freeze taxes against what may come. Whether it is a business or merely a tax theater depends on one detail that neither the bank nor the notary resolves: whether someone plans to reclaim the money.
Summary of a discussion on Burbuja.info - Foro de economía, actualidad y política., translated from Spanish and reviewed before publication.
Read the full discussion (106 replies).
The Diada in Catalonia is characterized by deep division between celebration and political friction, accompanied by falling attendance figures and an uncertain economic impact.