Dolmens and subtle energies: 24,000 bovis under El Escorial

From Alberite to El Guanol: the Spain that measures energies under the stones

The great dolmens were not calendars. They were something else. That is the thesis held by a current that has been growing for years on the margins of academic archaeology: megaliths were raised on top of telluric currents, sought the right latitude and served to "communicate what is above with what is below." The argument does not rest only on esoteric intuitions: there are radon maps from the Consejo de Seguridad Nuclear (Spain's Nuclear Safety Council), a network of lines described in 1954 by Dr. Ernst Hartmann and a popular science work on ley lines published this year. And there are figures. Many figures, all debatable.

The megalith as anchor, not as calendar

The central idea is that marking the solstices or equinoxes was not the monument's purpose, but a part of the process. Astronomical alignment would be the visible—and measurable—consequence of something unseen: fixing the construction on a specific telluric current. The recurring case is Alberite, presented as the largest dolmen in all of Europe and the best example of that relationship between stone and underground current.

This is where the distinction most disputed by conventional archaeology comes in: large dolmens would be genuine energy anchors, while small ones would be simple tombs. A hierarchy that, according to this reading, would explain why some have kilometre-long corridors and others fit in a plot. Over it is superimposed the suspicion of so-called cosmic tellurism, the energy that does not rise from the ground but descends from above, and that would turn these sites into a sort of invisible track that is not found just anywhere.

Hartmann lines, radon and the grids of the magnetic field

The pseudotechnical support for the hypothesis is global grids. The most cited is that of Dr. Ernst Hartmann, described in 1954 in his book on illness as a location problem, and which he deduced by comparing thousands of geo... The summary in circulation is simple: the Earth's magnetic field would form grids that act as preferential channels for energy circulation, with natural low-intensity radiation on their vertical, imperceptible to most.

To this is added the Curry grid and, in a more down-to-earth twist, the radon potential map published by the Consejo de Seguridad Nuclear. The metric used: 300 Bq/m3 means that 90% of buildings in an area are below it and 10% exceed it. That megaliths coincide with high-radon areas is, for some, proof that the builders knew something; for others, simple geological coincidence, because granite—where radon abounds—is also the material of which almost all of them are made.

From temples to banks: the thesis of Babylon's Banksters

One of the most travelled stretches of the subject connects megalithism and money. J. P. Farrell, a Cambridge graduate, is cited, and his book Babylon's Banksters, where he speculates that Babylonian buildings—an evolution of those primitive megalithic stations—served to communicate with similar stations through "resonant measurements." Priests would have taken advantage of those sites to concentrate celestial energies and, along the way, set up the financial business.

The historical anchor of that part is verifiable. The Temple of Saturn in Rome housed the aerarium, the state's public treasury, managed by two quaestors, one of whom kept the keys. Legend said no robberies were committed there. And in pilgrimage enclosures there were money changers who converted the visitor's currency into local currency before buying the offering, like any current exchange house. From there to claiming that Greek temples were bank branches is a leap no one has demonstrated.

Karnak, Newgrange and Menga: what does have a date

The hard data of European megalithism are stubborn. The menhir alignment of Karnac brings together more than 4,000 unhewn stones spread over some forty hectares, raised over several centuries between 4,500 and 2,500 BC, although the settlement dates back some 8,000 years. Those defending the energy hypothesis stress that almost all the menhirs are at the edge of the coast and that the ensemble looks like a defensive line parallel to the sea.

Newgrange, in Ireland, points to the winter solstice and is covered with spirals and triple spirals. The Menga dolmen, in Antequera, has a peculiarity that dismantles the perfect-calendar narrative: its alignment with the summer solstice is not exact because the corridor points to the Peña de los Enamorados, where an earlier cave-sanctuary existed, from around 6000 BC. The stone was not seeking the sun. It was seeking another stone.

Geopolymers: the hypothesis that unsettles enthusiasts themselves

In parallel, another line of work is growing, and this one is not energetic but material: that many megaliths were not extracted from a quarry, but manufactured with geopolymers, kneaded or melted stone. The argument is visual—size, weight, uniform colour, polished contours—and the counterargument is that the historical version of that technique is rammed earth. The discussion drifted into debates with public works communicators, who are recognised for their authority in engineering and denied any criteria on the ritual motives of those who raised the stones.

---

The unsettling detail is not in the 30,000 bovis of Loriguilla nor in the 24,000 attributed to the most energetic points of El Guanol. It is in Zumacales, Valladolid: a dolmen discovered by an archaeology enthusiast that took 38 years to be declared a Bien de Interés Cultural (Asset of Cultural Interest). If the problem were only that no one measures subtle energies, the administration would have resolved something much simpler earlier: protecting the stone.