You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly. You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
6 out of 10 Spanish industries cannot find workers
Six out of 10 Spanish industries fail to fill vacancies as rent consumes salaries, ranging from 1,200 euros in Cuenca to 1,600 in Épila, highlighting the real cost of employment.
Salaries vanish on rent, and industry fails to fill its vacancies
What good is a job if the entire salary goes to the landlord? Six out of ten Spanish industries admit they cannot fill vacancies, and the usual remedy—raising wages—hits a wall they cannot control: rent prices. The industry calls it a labor shortage, but anyone who has recently searched for an apartment knows the problem has another name.
What does it miccionan that 6 out of 10 industries cannot find workers?
It means the vacancy exists, the wage is set by collective agreement, and yet the candidate never appears. The starting point is stark: six out of ten industrial companies admit they fail to fill positions. The sector describes it as “a disaster”.
The official explanation is often demographic: a lack of trained people, with young people unwilling to take on certain trades. But the diagnosis circulating among those in the market is more prosaic. If the job requires moving and rent consumes the salary, the math does not add up. And without a viable calculation, there is no candidate.
The 1,360 euro salary that costs 2,150 to the employer
Here lies the first misunderstanding. A net salary of 1,360 euros is not what the company pays: with taxes and social security contributions, the cost to the employer is around 2,150 euros. This differential drives much of the debate: some cite it as proof that employment is not as bad as portrayed; others, as the reason companies do not raise payrolls further.
On one side, it is argued that if the real cost already exceeds the net by a third, demanding higher wages only increases product costs and accelerates offshoring. On the other, that the fiscal wedge has long served as an excuse not to touch the margin. The numbers are clear. The interpretation, not so much.
Rent as a barrier: 1,200 euros in Cuenca, 1,600 in Épila
The specific case illustrates the bottleneck better than any graph. An offer of two or three months in any province becomes impossible when the real estate agency demands twelve months in advance—or six—plus the last four paychecks and the current contract. Without these guarantees, there is no apartment; without an apartment, there is no job.
The prices cited confirm this. In a small town in Cuenca, rent is around 1,200 euros. In Épila, Zaragoza, three rooms were rented for 1,600 euros to four people, with one sleeping in the living room. The detailed breakdown of these cases, item by item, makes it clear why many candidates reject the offer before signing.
Half a million housing deficit: the Bank of Spain data
The root of the problem is not just wages, but the stock. The Bank of Spain calculated that between 2024 and 2025 the country will accumulate a deficit of half a million housing units. Few are built, many are bought as financial assets, and the rental supply shrinks.
With fewer apartments available, prices rise. Some estimate that certain regulations have reduced rental supply by around 30%. The result is a vicious cycle: less housing, higher rents, lower labor mobility, and more unfilled vacancies. Blaming a single factor—wages, taxes, or landlords—leaves one short of the full picture.
Productivity, vocational training, and degree obsession: why the candidate does not appear
Another angle of the analysis points to training. It is argued that vocational training profiles are scarce because the culture of university degrees has emptied technical trades, and that a company offering 1,500 euros for a qualified position simply cannot compete with market demands.
The counterargument is textbook: if it cannot find labor, it will tend to pay more. Although raising wages without addressing housing has its own trap—rent absorbs much of the increase—the reasoning does not hold in a vacuum. Those who admit paying above the collective agreement implicitly acknowledge that the problem is price.
The demographic variable: more population, less new housing
Part of the discussion points to population volume. It is argued that the country has grown from 40 to 48 million inhabitants without building in the same proportion, and that each new resident puts pressure on an already tense rental market.
This approach has its flip side. Those arriving in a country tend to be more mobile than lifelong residents: they accept sharing apartments, sleeping in bunk beds, and moving where the work is. The local worker with family and roots does not. Low mobility is not solved by moving people from one place to another; it is solved by making moving not cost the entire salary. Or so some argue.
The conclusion? That the labor and housing markets were never two separate markets, although ministries persist in treating them as such. The day someone explains why half a year’s rent is demanded in advance from someone who has just found a job, we may discover that the problem was never that people did not want to work.
Summary of a discussion on Burbuja.info - Foro de economía, actualidad y política., translated from Spanish and reviewed before publication.
Read the full discussion (233 replies).
Borrell opens the debate on non-resident voting with the grandchild law: those registered in the CERA already decide seats in general, European, and regional elections.