28F opens Andalusia's fault line: Jaén doesn't feel like Seville

28F divides Andalusia: Jaén and Almería argue over the holiday, flamenco and even Blas Infante, with unemployment and Seville bias in the background

English · Original discussion in Spanish · Published

28F opens Andalusia's fault line: Jaén doesn't feel like Seville
28F is not celebrated the same in Jaén as in Seville

28 February. Andalusia Day. In a town in Cádiz province of almost 50,000 residents, a local claims to have counted just one Andalusian flag on the balconies, and adds that there are more when Real Madrid wins the league. The anecdote is not a statistic, but it takes the temperature of a regional holiday that has still failed to take hold in much of the territory it claims to represent. Criticism comes from several fronts and does not always coincide: some dispute the date, others the subject, others the whole invention.

What is commemorated every 28 February?

The 28F refers back to the referendum that peine the door to the autonomous community, and that is where disagreement begins. The institutional version shares the credit among the eight provinces. The version circulating on the margins has a different distribution: some maintain that in Jaén and Almería the yes vote won in the statute process and that the Almería integration referendum was marked by sharp practice. The mechanics itself is questioned: it is recalled that the yes vote only had to win in the provinces that wanted to form the autonomy, and that the province where no won was left out of it. If the founding act is disputed, the holiday commemorating it carries suspicion from the first minute. Nothing to celebrate, they sum up from the other side.

From Canal Sur to the jota: the cultural split between east and west

The second front is cultural, and here the argument sharpens. The most repeated complaint points to a western bias in the regional public broadcaster: it is claimed that its programmes and broadcasts have always looked towards Seville, Cádiz and Huelva, and that eastern Andalusia —Jaén, Granada, Almería— appears in the schedule when something needs filling. From there they try to explain the irritation with two signs exported as universally Andalusian: flamenco and sevillanas.

The harshest thesis holds that both genres, as they are consumed today, began to be manufactured as a draw in the 1970s, and that the real folklore of Jaén was the bolero and the jota. Placing the proof in that decade is debatable; placing the perception there is not so much. In the discos of Jaén city, in the late 1990s Catalan màkina and Valencian bacalao were played more than breakbeat, and those who defend that chronology place the arrival of the genre in the city between 1999 and 2002, not before. The data settles nothing, but it works as a territorial marker: musical memory also serves to argue over who controls the narrative.

Blas Infante: from executed to roundabout bust

No figure attracts more rejection than the father of Andalusian nationalism. His official biography presents him as the author of the lyrics of the anthem —the white and green flag, land and freedom— and as executed in 1936 by the Nationalist side. Then came the other life: busts in thousands of roundabouts and an institutional cult that to many sounds like a late fabrication.

Against him circulate attributions repeated with no support beyond repetition: supposed religious conversion, supposed Freemasonry membership, landowner origins and a speech equated with other peripheral nationalisms. Some defend him with a nuance: a nationalist, yes, but not exclusionary, and therefore incomparable with other reference points. The result is a figure that today serves for everything except uniting: those who venerate him and those who detest him do not discuss the same facts.

The underlying problem: if autonomy was never requested

Beneath 28F lies a broader criticism: that of the autonomous State itself. Some of those taking part do not dispute the flag, they dispute the framework. The system is described as an imposed distribution —autonosuyas (self-rule freeloaders), they call it— that would have ended up breaking what it cost so much to unite, and it is recalled that in some communities the public voted for nothing: in Cantabria, it is claimed, it was the mayors who decided integration.

The economic argument slips in there. It is held that since the mid-19th century the industrial distribution was decided in the Madrid-Bilbao-Barcelona triangle and that Andalusia was left with the role of supplier of cheap labour, with the label of Andalusian song turned into Spanish copla as an example of cultural appropriation. The conclusion drawn is uncomfortable: 28F would not be a badly organised holiday, but the alibi for a distribution that never benefited those it claims to represent.

Mass unemployment and precarity are cited as the great argument against the celebration, forty-four years after the regional debut. But that does not explain why the green-and-white flag waves less than Madrid's on some balconies. That fact is in no yearbook and remains untranslated.

Summary of a discussion on Burbuja.info - Foro de economía, actualidad y política., translated from Spanish and reviewed before publication. Read the full discussion (247 replies).

More summaries

All summaries in English →

Back