Extreme Sparers: When Saving Becomes Pathological

The colleague who prefers working five more years rather than losing €1,000 in monthly pension

At 60, a bank employee earning €3,000 net per month (his vvife, Group A, earns another €3,000) has all expenses covered, no children, and the possibility of early retirement with minimal losses. His decision: endure five more years at work to keep receiving €6,000 instead of just over €5,000. His only declared hobby: picking mushrooms "because it's free." When he learned that several municipalities were starting to charge for this, he was outraged.

This is not an isolated case, but the archetype of the adult "miser," whom popular taxonomy distinguishes from the "lonchafinista"—the intelligent frugal person who optimizes without bitterness. The miser, however, deprives themselves of basic comforts merely for the pleasure of watching their bank account grow. It has nothing to do with necessity: the sample of cases collected over nearly two decades describes people with high incomes, multiple properties, and a single life goal: not spending.

The difference between smart saving and financial pathology

A thread open for more than 17 years has accumulated hundreds of examples drawing a subtle but clear boundary. On one side are those who reuse printed paper on one side, change chair pistons by collecting furniture from the trash, or fix flickering LED bulbs by changing a capacitor. That is lonchafinismo: initiative, recycling, no petty expenses. On the other, those who drive with expired vehicle inspections, tamper with electricity meters, or take water bottles from work home despite having a chief engineer's salary. There, saving borders on fraud or pathology.

The most extreme case is that of a surveying assistant who earned more than €2,000 per month and decided to sleep for two years in his car, in a construction site hut, or in the canteen, to avoid paying rent in Madrid. He cooked with camping gas, ate only pasta (no fridge), and drank tap water for breakfast while colleagues watched. He had two suits: blue work clothes and grey dress trousers. The house, in Toledo, was paid off. But even so, he didn't loosen a cent.

Sociological profile: inheritance of scarcity or pure greed?

Most cases share a generational pattern. People who lived through the post-war period or whose parents were raised in it, with an education where every resource counted. But the qualitative leap occurs when the mindset of scarcity survives abundance. A recurring analysis describes these individuals as "psychologically poor": unable to enjoy what they have, bitter about every expense, with work as their only identity. When they retire (forcedly), they isolate themselves or simply let themselves die.

However, not everything is trauma. Other cases seem to respond to a simple desire for unlimited accumulation, like the senior official who kept accounting records of each child's expenses, including wedding gifts, to deduct them from the inheritance. Or the retiree who noted "losses" when inviting others and "profits" when being invited. An obsession that transcends prudence to become a social pathology.

The disorienting data: €6,000 income and living as if in 1960

The father-in-law of the banker's colleague, the one who prefers five extra years of work over losing €1,000 a month, condenses the entire paradox. With €6,000 net monthly income (sum of both pensions), no children, and no mortgage, his only leisure is collecting free mushrooms. When the administration threatens to charge for collection permits, the indignation is immense. It is not simple greed: it is a disorder in the relationship with money where any expense, however small, is experienced as an existential loss.

The question remains in the air: how many thousands of euros have these profiles accumulated without enjoying them for a second? The answer is a secret they will take to the grave, probably without having spent even a third of what they saved.

Related debates in the forum

• The decline of my local Carrefour hypermarket · 55 replies