Ya van 3 en 2015: Canadian drilling services compay files bankruptcy

kemao2

Será en Octubre
Desde
10 Feb 2008
Mensajes
30.608
Reputación
25.996
Lugar
MADRID
Pronto en sus pantallas Talismán, la joya de Repsol:


http://www.burbuja.info/inmobiliari...psol-pierde-813-millones-caida-del-crudo.html


Talisman pierde 813 millones por la caída del crudo


◾En el cuarto trimestre, la compañía registró unas pérdidas de 1.419 millones


Talisman Energy perdió 911 millones de dólares (813 millones de euros) en 2014, un 22% menos que los 'números gente de izquierdas' de 1.175 millones de dólares (1.049 millones de euros) registrados en el ejercicio anterior, debido a la caída del precio del crudo y a las revisiones contables por 1.370 millones de dólares (1.223 millones de euros) provocadas por esta circunstancia.
 

ane agurain

Madmaxista
Desde
2 Jul 2013
Mensajes
18.089
Reputación
23.637
Lugar
Agurain
Obama vetoes Keystone pipeline approval bill - Yahoo Finance



---------- Post added 24-feb-2015 at 22:08 ----------

First B.C. oil slump casualty: Ivanhoe Energy faces bankruptcy | Mining & Energy | Business in Vancouver
Ivanhoe Energy seeks bankruptcy protection as oil prices weigh | Reuters
Ivanhoe Energy Files For Bankruptcy Protection - WSJ

---------- Post added 24-feb-2015 at 22:16 ----------

Texas-based gas producer Quicksilver Resources says may be forced into Chapter 11 - Natural Gas | Platts News Article & Story
http://www.bizjournals.com/dallas/news/2015/02/18/quicksilver-skips-interest-payment-as-chapter.html
http://www.shalegas.international/2015/02/20/quicksilver-resources-edging-closer-to-bankruptcy/

---------- Post added 24-feb-2015 at 22:19 ----------

http://www.shalegas.international/2...ut-spending-amid-tumbling-oil-and-gas-prices/
Five shale drillers cut spending amid tumbling oil and gas prices

Last week, Bank of America Corp. forecast that Brent futures are set to fall to as low as $31 a barrel by the end of the first quarter from about $48 now – Bloomberg reported. That’s even lower than the $36.30 seen during the depths of 2008’s financial crisis.

If the market stays this depressed, analysts believe that global spending on exploration and production could fall more than 30 percent this year, the biggest drop since 1986, according to forecasts from Cowen & Co., a New York-based investment bank.

In response to this unprecedented drop, exploration companies have embarked on a course of cost cutting and redundancies. Last Tuesday, the oil services company Baker Hughes said it would lay off about 7,000 workers, or 11 percent of its work force. Halliburton, another services provider, which is buying Baker Hughes for $34.6 billion, said it planned to cut jobs, too. Magnum Hunter Resources CEO, Gary Evans, told Reuters he believes the costs of oilfield services will drop 40 percent in the next year as the market adjusts to low commodity prices.

So, how have American shale companies reacted in response to the bear market for crude oil?
Magnum Hunter Resources

Magnum Hunter Resources Corp.
a small exploration company focused on natural gas production in the Marcellus, Utica, and Bakken shales, and whose shares have plunged 81 percent in the past year amid sinking natural gas prices, has announced in a conference call with its investors that the company will limit its spending to just $100 million this year.

The company, which concentrates on natural gas and natural gas liquids which account for approximately 90 percent of its production, expects to produce between 30,000 and 35,000 barrels of oil equivalent per in 2015.

During a conference call, the company’s chief executive, Gary Evans, assured investors that the company will continue to be profitable with natural gas prices at $2 per million British thermal units.

Natural gas for February delivery fell today to $2.916 per million British thermal units in electronic trading on the New York Mercantile Exchange.

The strength of Magnum Hunter, according to its CEO, lies in that it has managed to keep its production costs down. The company has no contracts locking it into using drilling rig or hydraulic fracturing crews, which will save money, Evans said. Magnum Hunter also managed to hedge 30 per cent of the company’s 2015 natural gas production – the maximum allowed by the banks.

When it comes to its current assets, Magnum Hunter does not plan on divesting its Bakken Shale acreage, although it has no plans to spend capital there on anything but well maintenance, Evans said. The company is seeking partners for a joint venture on its Utica shale holdings in Ohio, with a rough value of about $350 million.


Hess Corporation
According to John Hess, the CEO of Hess Corporation, with assets in the Bakken and the Utica shales, the company is well positioned to manage through the current price environment, with a strong balance sheet and resilient portfolio.

Greg Hill, President and COO, stated: “We are reducing our 2015 spending in the Bakken to $1.8 billion, compared with $2.2 billion in 2014. In 2015, we plan to operate an average of 9.5 rigs and bring approximately 210 new operated wells online, compared with 17 rigs and 238 operated wells brought online in 2014.

“Hess has some of the best acreage in the Bakken, and we will continue to drill in the core of the play which offers the most attractive returns. Substantially all our core acreage is held by production, which allows us to defer investment in the short term while maintaining the long term value and optionality of this important asset. As oil prices recover we will increase activity and production accordingly.

“In the Utica, we plan to spend $290 million compared with approximately $500 million last year, as we transition to early development at a measured pace in this price environment and as infrastructure builds out. Over 2015 our joint venture with CONSOL intends to execute a two rig program focused in the core of the wet gas window and bring 25-30 new wells online, compared with four rigs and 39 new wells in 2014.


Carrizo Oil & Gas
Houston-based Carrizo Oil & Gas also announced cuts in its budget but pledged not to abandon exploration of its Eagle Ford assets.

The company has cut its overall budget for 2015 by 30 per cent, which means that after the adjustment it is expected to spend between $450 million to $470 million to drill and complete wells in 2015, down from around $515 million last year.

Carrizo also revised its well costs in the Eagle Ford Shale by the fourth quarter of the year to $5.8 million from $7.5 million in November 2014.

The company’s President and CEO, S.P. “Chip” Johnson IV, also commented on the falling prices of oilfield services, saying that the company has saved 12 per cent compared with late 2014 service costs, and expects these costs to go down by another 20 per cent by the end of the year.

Carrizo Oil & Gas holds about 81,000 net acres in the Eagle Ford Shale, where despite reduction in capital spending, it expects to increase total oil production this year by 17 per cent.


Sanchez Energy
The shale explorer Sanchez Energy also chose to cut its 2015 budget. It currently stands somewhere between $600 to $650 million – 30 per cent down from November 2014, which in turn was less than the $1.15 billion envisioned before oil prices started their decline in June.

“In response to the deteriorating commodity price environment, Sanchez Energy has elected to further reduce its 2015 capital plan to a range of $600 million to $650 million,” President and Chief Executive Officer Tony Sanchez said in a statement.

Despite the depressed oil and crude prices and cuts to its budget, the company expects to increase its production from its Eagle Ford assets to between 40,000 and 44,000 barrels of oil equivalent per day, which the company said would be a 40 percent increase from last year if sustained.

Swift Energy Company
Swift Energy Company, also based in Houston, Texas, plans to cut its 2015 spending by a whopping 75 per cent, down to around US$100 – $125 million.

Terry Swift, CEO of Swift Energy commented, “Our revised budget, representing a 70-75% decrease in spending from 2014, reflects the lower commodity price environment we face in 2015 and demonstrates our response during this down cycle. We continue to work with our vendors and suppliers to reduce service costs and are taking steps to materially reduce field level operating and corporate overhead expenses.”

Swift Energy Company, which focuses on oil and gas properties in onshore Texas and Louisiana and in the inland waters of Louisiana, did not cease exploration work. It has recently noted promising results from its four new Eagle Ford wells in the Fasken area in Webb County, Texas.

“We are pleased with our drilling and completion efforts in Fasken, as we have now drilled 14 consecutive wells with average initial production tests in excess of 20 MMcf/d. These results demonstrate that deploying customized, engineered completions in horizontal laterals drilled in precise target zones of the Eagle Ford shale improve the productivity of our wells,” Swift said in a statement.

As falling commodity prices bite into profits, more and more companies decide to wind down production, with Baker Hughes rig count showing more than a three per cent decline in rigs actively exploring for or producing hydrocarbons in North America.

---------- Post added 24-feb-2015 at 22:20 ----------

http://www.shalegas.international/2015/02/23/chevron-leaves-romania/
Chevron leaves Romania

---------- Post added 24-feb-2015 at 22:22 ----------

Second Bulk Shipper Files for Bankruptcy
http://www.marinelink.com/news/bankruptcy-shipper-second386049.aspx

A second dry cargo shipper has filed for bankruptcy amowing a collapse in freight rates that has forced many companies to idle vessels used to haul iron ore, coal and grain rather than hire out the ships at a loss.

Weaker demand from China and an oversupply of ships has led to the worst industry downturn in 30 years, pushing the Baltic dry index - the industry benchmark for freight rates - to an all-time low.

China's Winland Ocean Shipping Corp filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection in the United States on Feb. 12, court documents show, the second banruptcy this month.

"Due to current market conditions, the financial position of the company and its subsidiaries has deteriorated, leading to immediate difficulties," the document states, adding that it had therefore filed for Chapter 11 protection.

Privately owned Danish firm Copenship filed for bankruptcy earlier in February after losses in the dry bulk market.

"The combination of lower steel demand in China and the huge volume of new tonnage coming on line is what is causing panic and making this the worst bulk market since the mid-1980s," said Hsu Chih-chien, chairman of Hong Kong and Singapore-listed dry bulk shipper Courage Marine.

China's imports tumbled 19.9 percent from a year earlier as its economy grows at its slowest rate in 24 years.

The current freight rate for carrying a cargo of coal in a panamax ship from Indonesia to southern China is about $3,000 per day, compared with more than $6,000 last year. The Baltic dry index has slumped by nearly two-thirds in the past 15 months.

Adding to slowing demand is a swelling fleet, with the number of ordered capesize and panamax carriers for the next three years equal to 39 percent of the existing fleet, according to shipping services firm Clarkson. Yet dry-bulk seaborne trade rose only 4 percent last year.

As a result, dozens of capesize and panamax vessels have been idle around Singapore, Hong Kong and off South Africa's coast, Reuters ship tracking data showed.

Dry-bulkers are not the only shippers in trouble. Over 10 percent of the global liquefied natural gas (LNG) tanker fleet is currently idled after Asian LNG prices fell almost two-thirds since February 2014.

---------- Post added 24-feb-2015 at 22:23 ----------

Quien dice 2, dice 3:
Third dry-bulk shipper files for bankruptcy as rates tumble


A third dry cargo shipper has filed for bankruptcy this month amowing a collapse in freight rates to historic lows in what shippers call the worst market conditions since the 1980s.

South Korea’s Daebo International Shipping Co Ltd filed a court receivership, a form of corporate bankruptcy, on Feb. 11, mainly due to poor dry bulk market conditions, a company official said on Monday. It is the third known bulk shipper bankruptcy this month.

Weaker demand from China and an oversupply of ships has led to the industry downturn, pushing the Baltic dry index – the industry benchmark for freight rates – to an all-time low this month. The index has slumped by nearly two-thirds in the past 15 months. “The dry bulk market is in a really bad shape, which has hit us hard,” the Daebo International official told Reuters by phone. He declined to be identified as he was not authorized to speak to media. “We did our best but we cannot help it.” He said the court ordered Daebo’s assets to be frozen on Feb. 13.

Daebo International mainly provides panamax-sized dry bulk shipping services such as iron ore, coal, grains and steel products, according to its website. South Korea is the latest major shipping country to be hit by a bankruptcy in the sector.

China’s Winland Ocean Shipping Corp filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection in the United States on Feb. 12, court documents show, also citing difficult market conditions.

In Denmark, privately owned Copenship filed for bankruptcy earlier in February after losses in the dry bulk market. “The combination of lower steel demand in China and the huge volume of new tonnage coming on line is what is causing panic and making this the worst bulk market since the mid-1980s,”

Hsu Chih-chien, chairman of Hong Kong and Singapore-listed dry bulk shipper Courage Marine said this month. China’s imports tumbled 19.9 percent in January from a year earlier as its economy grows at its slowest rate in 24 years.

Dry-bulkers are not the only shippers in trouble. Over 10 percent of the global liquefied natural gas (LNG) tanker fleet is currently estimated to be idled after Asian LNG prices fell almost two-thirds since February 2014.
http://www.hellenicshippingnews.com/third-dry-bulk-shipper-files-for-bankruptcy-as-rates-tumble/

---------- Post added 24-feb-2015 at 22:25 ----------

De momento se ve poco movimiento para las perdidas que han tenido/tienen/tendrán a este precio no?
Ya hay unas pocas más :D
 
Última edición:

ane agurain

Madmaxista
Desde
2 Jul 2013
Mensajes
18.089
Reputación
23.637
Lugar
Agurain

ane agurain

Madmaxista
Desde
2 Jul 2013
Mensajes
18.089
Reputación
23.637
Lugar
Agurain
Aunque se ha producido una pequeña remontada en la cotización del barril de petróleo, las compañías petroleras de todo el mundo ya están modificando sus estrategias para intentar hacer frente a las pérdidas que les está empezando a provocar la espectacular caída del precio del crudo que comenzó hace unos meses. Muchas de ellas han anunciado grandes recortes en sus plantillas, reducciones en el número de proyectos y cierres de pozos. Detrás queda una década de altos precios del oro neցro, que les supuso importantes ganancias y les ayudó a ganar cuota de mercado.

Es el caso de la británica BG Group, que se está planteando reducir sus inversiones entre los 6.000 y los 7.000 millones de dólares, unos recortes que irán acompañados de una reducción del 10% de su gasto operativo para 2015. En 2014 la compañía ya redujo un 15% su plantilla. Los analistas consideran esta actuación puntual, ya que la puesta en marcha de nuevos proyectos sitúa a la empresa en buena posición para salir del bache.

La canadiense Pacific Rubiales también se encuentra en una situación complicada. Su caída de más de un 60% en la bolsa colombiana, país en el que tiene una fuerte presencia, ha hecho saltar las alarmas. Además, Pacific cuenta con el problema añadido de una gigantesca deuda que ronda los 5.000 millones de dólares. Aunque la empresa ha hecho público que esta situación no afectará a los 3.100 trabajadores directos de la compañía, sí tendrá consecuencias para los más de 10.000 contratistas con los que trabajan.

También en Colombia Ecopetrol está teniendo problemas. Frente a los gastos y reducción de los proyectos de perforación, la estatal ha anunciado un plan de inversiones para 2015 un 26% inferior al de 2014, así como un plan de reducción de costes y gastos operacionales por valor de 3.565 millones de dólares. Aunque no se ha pronunciado sobre el número de despidos, podrían haber perdido su empleo 1.500 personas de empresas subcontratistas.

En el caso de las empresas de servicios tenemos a Schlumberger, el mayor proveedor de tecnología de perforación de petróleo y equipamiento americano, que anunció en enero el despido de cerca de 9.000 empleados -el 8% de la plantilla-, debido a que sus clientes han reducido sus presupuestos para perforación. También ha anunciado recortes la compañía suiza de servicios petroleros Weatherford International que, tras registrar unas pérdidas de 475 millones de dólares, planea despedir a un total de 5.000 personas en el primer trimestre del año, especialmente en América y Europa occidental.

Los beneficios de las empresas han comenzado a resentirse, especialmente en el último trimestre, cuando la caída de la cotización ha sido más pronunciada. Es el caso de la británica BP, que ha reducido su beneficio neto en 2014 en un 80% y que en el cuarto trimestre ha registrado pérdidas superiores a los 4.000 millones de dólares, lo que está llevando a la petrolera a recomponer su negocio. Entre las medidas, congelar el sueldo a sus 84.000 empleados y recortar su plan de inversiones para este año en 17.500 millones de euros. En enero también anunció un recorte de 300 empleos en el Mar del Norte.
Reflejo en los beneficios

Lo mismo está sucediendo con otras grandes petroleras como Statoil. La noruega ha obtenido un beneficio neto un 43% inferior al de 2013 -2.500 millones de euros-. En el cuarto trimestre ha registrado pérdidas superiores a los 1.000 millones de euros frente a unas ganancias de casi 2.000 millones en el mismo periodo de 2014. Desde la empresa apuntan que la flexibilidad de su programa de inversiones les mantiene bien posicionados. La compañía reducirá de 17.544 millones a 15.789 millones de euros el gasto orgánico de capital.

Shell ha ganado un 8% menos en 2014 -unos 13.000 millones de euros-, mientras que sus beneficios trimestrales se han hundido en más de un 50%. La petrolera ha anunciado un recorte de 15.000 millones de dólares en el gasto, que implicará la cancelación y el aplazamiento de proyectos hasta 2017, lo que representará una rebaja anual del 14% desde 2014 en relación con la inversión de capital de 35.000 millones de dólares.

Las ganancias del pasado año de Chevron han sido de 17.000 millones de euros -un 10% menos-, mientras que los beneficios del último trimestre retrocedieron casi un 30%. La petrolera estadounidense ha anunciado que suspenderá todos los programas de recompra de acciones en 2015 como y frena sus planes de inversión en shale en Europa.

El beneficio de la francesa Total ha caído un 62% -4.244 millones de dólares-.

La compañía ya ha anunciado que reducirá su plan de inversiones para 2015 en torno al 10%, lo que supondrá menos recursos a sus explotaciones en el Mar del Norte y África occidental y un 30% menos del presupuesto de explotación y también está planteando despidos. La petrolera estadounidense ExxonMobil ha tenido menos impacto gracias a la diversificación de su negocio. Su beneficio anual -28.725 millones de euros-, ha sido similar al del año anterior, aunque sus ganancias en los tres últimos meses de 2014 se hayan desplomado en un 21% -6.500 millones-.

Galp tampoco se puede quejar. La petrolera lusa ha cerrado 2014 con un aumento de sus beneficios netos del 20,2% -373 millones de euros-. De hecho, a pesar de la caída del precio del crudo, la compañía ha obtenido ganancias en todas sus unidades de negocio, desde la exploración y producción hasta el refino y el gas natural.


Leer más: Las petroleras frenan sus inversiones para luchar contra el bajo precio del crudo - elEconomista.es Las petroleras frenan sus inversiones para luchar contra el bajo precio del crudo - elEconomista.es
 

ane agurain

Madmaxista
Desde
2 Jul 2013
Mensajes
18.089
Reputación
23.637
Lugar
Agurain
En Pemex ondeará la bandera americana.

Al tiempo.
Ola qué ase?




UPDATE 1-Brazil's Oleo e Gas says reviewing viability of oil output | Energy & Oil | Reuters

Recordemos que llevan 4 semanas de huelga:
As US oil strike reaches one month, companies sit on billions in profits - World Socialist Web Site


Y Reuters, unos aprendices al lado de este hilo:
Factbox: Latest U.S. bankruptcies by oil and gas companies | Reuters


(Reuters) - Bankruptcy filings in the oil and gas sector are widely expected to increase in the coming months amowing a slide of more than 50 percent in crude oil prices since June, to about $50 per barrel.

The price decline has put acute pressure on small companies with weak balance sheets and hurt sales for related services companies that sell everything from sand to drilling rigs to temporary housing.

Parts of the industry, especially the offshore drilling sector, were already under pressure when oil was still above $100 a barrel as many producers were shifting their focus to onshore work in the U.S. fracking boom.

Below is a rundown on some recent oil and gas bankruptcy filings in U.S. courts:

January 2015: WBH Energy, one of many tiny shale oil and gas producers in Texas, files for bankruptcy protection, becoming what may be the first U.S. company of its kind to do so since crude prices started tumbling six months ago. It listed both assets and liabilities of between $10 million and $50 million in its filing in U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Western District of Texas on Sunday.

November 2014: KiOR Inc, a company based in Houston that works on turning biomass into renewable crude oil that is processed into gasoline, diesel and fuel oil blendstocks, files for bankruptcy, listing $86 million in assets.

October 2014: Endeavour International Corp an oil and gas exploration and production company focused on the North Sea and the United States, seeks creditor protection after saying it will stop making interest payments on its debts. It said in August its production would be small, at 9,500-10,500 barrels of oil equivalent per day, and it filed with $1.5 billion in assets.

October 2014: Marion Energy, a natural gas exploration and production company, files for bankruptcy.

May 2014: Houston's Buccaneer Energy Limited, an upstream oil and gas company, files for bankruptcy protection with $152 million in assets.

March 2014: Houston-based Global Geophysical Services , which does seismic work for oil and gas exploration companies, files for bankruptcy.

February 2014: Lexico Resources International Corp, an oil and gas company based in Houston, files for bankruptcy with less than $150,000 in assets.

February 2014: Tuscany International Holdings seeks protection as liquidity constraints press the Canadian contract driller to cut its debt load and explore strategic alternatives. The driller said that revenue and rig utilization had fallen over on stiff competition in the oilfield services market, leading to cash shortages.

Sources: BankruptcyData.com, court filings
 

ane agurain

Madmaxista
Desde
2 Jul 2013
Mensajes
18.089
Reputación
23.637
Lugar
Agurain
Scores İnjured İn S. Algeria Anti-Gas Drilling Protests
Scores were injured Sunday in clashes between security forces and protesters opposing excavation operations for shale gas in southern Algeria, local activists have said.

Scores were injured Sunday in clashes between security forces and protesters opposing excavation operations for shale gas in southern Algeria, local activists have said. "Twenty people were injured when clashes erupted this afternoon in Tamanrasset city between police and protesters who reject the shale gas exploitation," Taqi Abdel-Rahman, a member of a local grassroots group which rallies against shale gas excavations in the Tamanrasset, told The Anadolu Agency. Abdel-Rahman said that protesters had blocked a highway linking Algeria to next-door Niger. For his part, Lamani Khaled, a member of Tamanrasset's local council, told AA that security forces "intervened to reopen the vital highway." Local activists in the southern Ain Salah city have also said that violent clashes erupted between police forces and protesters. "At least 40 protesters and 19 security personnel were slightly injured in the clashes which lasted for eight hours," activist Othman Taher told AA. Protesters in several parts of southern Algeria have held near-daily protests since last December to pressure authorities to halt shale gas drilling in the area. Estimated at 19.8 billion cubic meters, Algeria is the world's third largest holder of shale gas reserves, preceded by China and Argentina, according to a recent U.S. government report. Anadolu Agency - Alger
 

Janus

Será en Octubre
Desde
18 Ago 2011
Mensajes
39.785
Reputación
63.367
Aunque se ha producido una pequeña remontada en la cotización del barril de petróleo, las compañías petroleras de todo el mundo ya están modificando sus estrategias para intentar hacer frente a las pérdidas que les está empezando a provocar la espectacular caída del precio del crudo que comenzó hace unos meses. Muchas de ellas han anunciado grandes recortes en sus plantillas, reducciones en el número de proyectos y cierres de pozos. Detrás queda una década de altos precios del oro neցro, que les supuso importantes ganancias y les ayudó a ganar cuota de mercado.

Es el caso de la británica BG Group, que se está planteando reducir sus inversiones entre los 6.000 y los 7.000 millones de dólares, unos recortes que irán acompañados de una reducción del 10% de su gasto operativo para 2015. En 2014 la compañía ya redujo un 15% su plantilla. Los analistas consideran esta actuación puntual, ya que la puesta en marcha de nuevos proyectos sitúa a la empresa en buena posición para salir del bache.

La canadiense Pacific Rubiales también se encuentra en una situación complicada. Su caída de más de un 60% en la bolsa colombiana, país en el que tiene una fuerte presencia, ha hecho saltar las alarmas. Además, Pacific cuenta con el problema añadido de una gigantesca deuda que ronda los 5.000 millones de dólares. Aunque la empresa ha hecho público que esta situación no afectará a los 3.100 trabajadores directos de la compañía, sí tendrá consecuencias para los más de 10.000 contratistas con los que trabajan.

También en Colombia Ecopetrol está teniendo problemas. Frente a los gastos y reducción de los proyectos de perforación, la estatal ha anunciado un plan de inversiones para 2015 un 26% inferior al de 2014, así como un plan de reducción de costes y gastos operacionales por valor de 3.565 millones de dólares. Aunque no se ha pronunciado sobre el número de despidos, podrían haber perdido su empleo 1.500 personas de empresas subcontratistas.

En el caso de las empresas de servicios tenemos a Schlumberger, el mayor proveedor de tecnología de perforación de petróleo y equipamiento americano, que anunció en enero el despido de cerca de 9.000 empleados -el 8% de la plantilla-, debido a que sus clientes han reducido sus presupuestos para perforación. También ha anunciado recortes la compañía suiza de servicios petroleros Weatherford International que, tras registrar unas pérdidas de 475 millones de dólares, planea despedir a un total de 5.000 personas en el primer trimestre del año, especialmente en América y Europa occidental.

Los beneficios de las empresas han comenzado a resentirse, especialmente en el último trimestre, cuando la caída de la cotización ha sido más pronunciada. Es el caso de la británica BP, que ha reducido su beneficio neto en 2014 en un 80% y que en el cuarto trimestre ha registrado pérdidas superiores a los 4.000 millones de dólares, lo que está llevando a la petrolera a recomponer su negocio. Entre las medidas, congelar el sueldo a sus 84.000 empleados y recortar su plan de inversiones para este año en 17.500 millones de euros. En enero también anunció un recorte de 300 empleos en el Mar del Norte.
Reflejo en los beneficios

Lo mismo está sucediendo con otras grandes petroleras como Statoil. La noruega ha obtenido un beneficio neto un 43% inferior al de 2013 -2.500 millones de euros-. En el cuarto trimestre ha registrado pérdidas superiores a los 1.000 millones de euros frente a unas ganancias de casi 2.000 millones en el mismo periodo de 2014. Desde la empresa apuntan que la flexibilidad de su programa de inversiones les mantiene bien posicionados. La compañía reducirá de 17.544 millones a 15.789 millones de euros el gasto orgánico de capital.

Shell ha ganado un 8% menos en 2014 -unos 13.000 millones de euros-, mientras que sus beneficios trimestrales se han hundido en más de un 50%. La petrolera ha anunciado un recorte de 15.000 millones de dólares en el gasto, que implicará la cancelación y el aplazamiento de proyectos hasta 2017, lo que representará una rebaja anual del 14% desde 2014 en relación con la inversión de capital de 35.000 millones de dólares.

Las ganancias del pasado año de Chevron han sido de 17.000 millones de euros -un 10% menos-, mientras que los beneficios del último trimestre retrocedieron casi un 30%. La petrolera estadounidense ha anunciado que suspenderá todos los programas de recompra de acciones en 2015 como y frena sus planes de inversión en shale en Europa.

El beneficio de la francesa Total ha caído un 62% -4.244 millones de dólares-.

La compañía ya ha anunciado que reducirá su plan de inversiones para 2015 en torno al 10%, lo que supondrá menos recursos a sus explotaciones en el Mar del Norte y África occidental y un 30% menos del presupuesto de explotación y también está planteando despidos. La petrolera estadounidense ExxonMobil ha tenido menos impacto gracias a la diversificación de su negocio. Su beneficio anual -28.725 millones de euros-, ha sido similar al del año anterior, aunque sus ganancias en los tres últimos meses de 2014 se hayan desplomado en un 21% -6.500 millones-.

Galp tampoco se puede quejar. La petrolera lusa ha cerrado 2014 con un aumento de sus beneficios netos del 20,2% -373 millones de euros-. De hecho, a pesar de la caída del precio del crudo, la compañía ha obtenido ganancias en todas sus unidades de negocio, desde la exploración y producción hasta el refino y el gas natural.


Leer más: Las petroleras frenan sus inversiones para luchar contra el bajo precio del crudo - elEconomista.es Las petroleras frenan sus inversiones para luchar contra el bajo precio del crudo - elEconomista.es




Los usanos están dando el tiro de gracia a los países emergentes. Son llamados emergentes y es difícil saber por qué ya que son países coyunturalmente burbuja. Todos se inflaron por las materias primas (de diferente índole). Ninguno tiene un mercado interior relevante y todos tienen una muy notable desigualdad social originada en que los nichos que generan riqueza están siempre en manos de unos pocos que sobornan y mantienen al poder. Me da igual hablar de Brasil, de México, de Colombia, de Perú .......

Los usanos con el precio del crudo y con el bajón importador de materias primas desde Asia, han machacado el futuro de todo lo que hay desde El Paso hacia el sur, hasta más abajo del Paine.

Ahora toca la repatriación de capitales que se hincharon de ganancias en los últimos 10 años. Obvio que los Sudamericanos en los gobiernos, como todo castuzo que se precie, hipotecaron el futuro de sus países para adelantar la riqueza. Todo está lleno de deudas con colateral relacionado con el futuro de medio plazo en esos países.

Vayan a Brasil y vean como no hay mercado interior ni consumo, cómo la confianza del consumir está en el basement, cómo la corrupción ya no respeta a los antes aliados en el poder, cómo el petróleo a miles de km de la costa y varios km de profundidad no puede extraerse porque es el doble de barato comprarlo en el mercado, cómo la seguridad no existe y cómo la desigualdad social es brutal. Y vean el miedo atroz existente a que pasen los JJ.OO para que hagan cataboom.

Vayan a México y vean cómo el petróleo está aniquilando todas las promesas electorales de Peña Nieto, y la corrupción of course. Cantarel ha sido muy rentable (no debe superar los 12 usd la extracción del barril) ya que está a muy poca distancia de la costa y a varias decenas de metros de profundidad pero ya se acaba. El resto es cosa pura que deben refinar en Texas para volver a importarlo. Verguenza que un país con petróleo tenga la gasofa a precios superiores a Europa equiparando poder adquisitivo.
Pemex no tiene solución.

Vayan a Colombia y verán que la casta está tendiendo hacia la anarquía y como solo un grupo empresarial controla negocios petroleros, medios de comunicación, aseguradoras, bancos, ..... Medellín es el verdadero centro de poder que explota los tentáculos que ejecutan la riqueza en Bogotá. El país se torna cada vez más peligroso.

Vayan a Chile y además de no encontrar mujeres guapas verán cómo les está haciendo daño la caída del precio de cobre. El Estado es dueña de Codelco, en donde está el 25 del PIB del país.

Argentina nunca superará la lacra de la corrupción ni el conformismo social que la acepta tal y como es.

Perú hará catacrock pero en menor medida. Su problema es que puede crecer al 10% una década (ni lo hace ni lo hará) y no conseguirá superar a la riqueza de una país normalito. Vienen desde muy abajo. Hoy en día allí se están enriqueciendo las multinacionales a cambio de un sueldecito para los parias locales. Capitalismo puro y globalización a espuertas.

Todo el dinero va a salir de allí de estampida. Las monedas locales se derrumbarán por ello y las deudas estarán todas denominadas en USD. Se tendrán que ejecutar las garantías y la riqueza nacional caerá en las manos de los acreedores. Como siempre, hay que ser muy pardillo para no verlo claro.
 

Puertas

Madmaxista
Desde
10 Ago 2014
Mensajes
3.997
Reputación
9.049
Sobran dos millones de barriles en el mercado. Tienen que caer muchas más.
 

ane agurain

Madmaxista
Desde
2 Jul 2013
Mensajes
18.089
Reputación
23.637
Lugar
Agurain
Fuel Fix » Cal Dive files for chapter 11 bankruptcy protection

HOUSTON – Offshore oil services company Cal Dive International and its U.S. units have filed for chapter 11 bankruptcy, joining the handful of domestic firms to restructure their balance sheets amid low oil prices.

The Houston firm said this week it is set to sell off its least important assets and plans to either reorganize or sell its main subsea contracting business, which helps oil companies maintain offshore production platforms and pipelines.

“Our business has experienced several adverse events that were beyond our control, and with our current capital structure, we are no longer able to financially withstand the industry downturn,” Cal Dive CEO Quinn Hébert said in a written statement.

He said the firm took a financial last year hit after two large projects were suspended and other contract work was delayed during bad weather. It had entered contracts that said the company would get paid only when it reached certain milestones in the projects, making the delays worse for its finances. The situation hampered its ability to get additional financing, especially when oil prices collapsed, Hébert said.

Its overseas businesses, it said, will keep operating outside of bankruptcy proceedings. Its U.S. businesses will still run under the federal bankruptcy court in Delaware, with $120 million in debtor-in-possession credit from Bank of America and other lenders. It said it will complete work on construction projects in Mexico and elsewhere.

Cal Dive had skipped a $2.2 million interest payment in January on 5-percent bonds that mature in 2017, and entered a 30-day grace period to keep talking with its lenders. It had 1,550 full-time employees at the end of 2013, according to regulatory filings.

“By availing ourselves of the chapter 11 process, we can achieve an orderly restructuring for our business that has consistently produced competitive results under a more favorable capital structure,” Hébert said.

Cal Dive probably won’t be the last oil company to file for bankruptcy protection — other firms have announced they’re skipping interest payments and credit experts expect more debt defaults down the road. Austin-based WBH Energy Partners had also filed for chapter 11 bankruptcy protection in Texas court in January.

---------- Post added 05-mar-2015 at 23:44 ----------

Analyzing Potential Bankruptcies in the Upstream Sector of the Oil and Gas Industry | Texas Lawyer

Oil prices continue to languish in early 2015, prompting many to look ahead toward potential restructuring opportunities. With so much focus on finding the bottom, one can only wonder what may occur before the top is again in view. This article provides some context to that intermediate analysis of what may occur within the upstream sector of the oil and gas industry.

The analysis requires some categorization at the threshold. Focusing on the upstream sector of the oil and gas industry, the two general categories are companies engaged in exploration and production versus oilfield services. The way companies within these two components of the upstream sector are built—and, thus, rebuilt through bankruptcy—vary substantially.

One critical difference is financing. OFS financing varies little from traditional business norms with the hard assets (usually made of iron in this industry), accounts receivables, and general intangibles providing the collateral. E&P companies may provide the same collateral, but E&P companies also finance their operations using their oil and gas reserves as collateral (the borrowing base). Lenders of such reserves based loans use a combination of geological and financial factors to estimate the anticipated present value of future production from the reserves included within the borrowing base. This amount affects the loan amount at which the RBL Lender is properly collateralized and thus willing to lend. And the target is a moving one as borrowing bases are subject to periodic redeterminations.

E&P companies will use hedging strategies such as futures, swaps, or option contracts as protection against future volatility in commodity prices. For a commodities seller, such contracts trade the risk of selling at market price in the future for the guarantee of a buyer agreeing to pay a set price potentially below the future market price. A company's hedging strategies factor into the borrowing base calculation because effective hedging buttresses the borrowing base by ensures future income.

An effective hedging strategy can help an E&P company weather a considerable period of depressed commodities prices. For example, an E&P company receiving $80 per barrel of oil through a futures contract for a three-year period may be relatively unscathed by a two-year drop in oil prices to $50 per barrel during the middle of the futures contract. This oversimplification demonstrates that an E&P company may protect itself through effective hedging.

But even where an E&P company is exposed and subject to a borrowing base redetermination, RBL Lenders may not wish to effectively call the loan by slashing the borrowing base. Instead, the lenders may delay or forebear a redetermination or alternatively, stair-step down the determination so as to gradually disperse the financial blow.

Under many of these situations, an E&P company may face distress, yet survive on the basis of savvy financial and operational management. OFS companies may not be so fortunate.

E&P operations have a causal relationship with OFS companies. E&P companies may cease drilling new wells, except to the point necessary to continue a lease, and thereby minimize the effect of lower prices. But the resulting effect on the oilfield services sector is traumatic. Capital budget decreases by E&P companies have a direct and meaningful impact on rig counts in the United States and the demand for oilfield services. And where demand continues, customers (E&P companies) are seeking, and expect, to extract price reductions from existing and ongoing production. For example, industry experts project that daily lease rates for drilling rigs or the cost of fracking services may drop as much as twenty percent. E&P companies may cease production altogether in areas of expensive logistics, directly affecting OFS groups with specialized technology for such areas.

As a result, providers of oilfield services are especially vulnerable and will likely face liquidity crises long before E&P companies. Moreover, leading up to the recent six-month skid in oil prices, many oilfield services providers had been using leverage to upgrade equipment in anticipation of continued high-margin production, which now only further destabilizes their financial footing.

These distinctions are important when gazing into the oil and gas crystal ball. As to the E&P side, production will continue (and likely increase) as demand has not subsided and the marginal cost for proven wells remains below even depressed prices. As to the OFS side, trouble awaits, perhaps as early as this summer. OFS providers will need liquidity as receivables dissipate, providing an opportunity for second lien lenders, or, once distress arrives, accretive acquisitions.

Bankruptcy may provide opportunities for OFS providers, either to reorganize operations as a going concern operation or to sell assets. The latter consideration is a common reason for a bankruptcy process as the Bankruptcy Code allows for assets of the bankruptcy estate to be sold free and clear of existing liens, and on an expedited basis, in certain circumstances. Bankruptcy may also provide an opportunity for the company to reject certain unfavorable contracts or unexpired leases in favor of more-favorable arrangements. Likewise, the plan of reorganization process provides the ability to force dissenting constituencies to accept the debtor's proposed treatment through the "cramdown" process.

Another relevant consideration is that the oilfield services industry is heavily dependent on management's relationships, so retaining key employees may be critical for the value of a going concern. However, such retention may pose problems as non-ordinary-course transactions (placing limits on severance or key employee retention programs).

Oil and gas may well define the world of bankruptcy in 2015, although many of these outcomes are achievable through consensual out-of-court restructurings.. Nonetheless, some correction and consolidation within the oilfield services sector is imminent. Watch for increased mergers and acquisitions activity or bankruptcies within the oilfield services industry—there is plenty of available capital. Perhaps the top again will be in view soon thereafter.

---------- Post added 05-mar-2015 at 23:47 ----------

Transocean (RIG) Stock Closed Down Today as Oil Declined - TheStreet

Worrying signs as global crude oil inventory hits 80-year high - The Smart Investor
crude oil inventory hits 80-year high
 

bertok

Será en Octubre
Desde
23 Jul 2009
Mensajes
42.337
Reputación
72.933
Lugar
Rocky Mountains
Fuel Fix » Cal Dive files for chapter 11 bankruptcy protection

HOUSTON – Offshore oil services company Cal Dive International and its U.S. units have filed for chapter 11 bankruptcy, joining the handful of domestic firms to restructure their balance sheets amid low oil prices.

The Houston firm said this week it is set to sell off its least important assets and plans to either reorganize or sell its main subsea contracting business, which helps oil companies maintain offshore production platforms and pipelines.

“Our business has experienced several adverse events that were beyond our control, and with our current capital structure, we are no longer able to financially withstand the industry downturn,” Cal Dive CEO Quinn Hébert said in a written statement.

He said the firm took a financial last year hit after two large projects were suspended and other contract work was delayed during bad weather. It had entered contracts that said the company would get paid only when it reached certain milestones in the projects, making the delays worse for its finances. The situation hampered its ability to get additional financing, especially when oil prices collapsed, Hébert said.

Its overseas businesses, it said, will keep operating outside of bankruptcy proceedings. Its U.S. businesses will still run under the federal bankruptcy court in Delaware, with $120 million in debtor-in-possession credit from Bank of America and other lenders. It said it will complete work on construction projects in Mexico and elsewhere.

Cal Dive had skipped a $2.2 million interest payment in January on 5-percent bonds that mature in 2017, and entered a 30-day grace period to keep talking with its lenders. It had 1,550 full-time employees at the end of 2013, according to regulatory filings.

“By availing ourselves of the chapter 11 process, we can achieve an orderly restructuring for our business that has consistently produced competitive results under a more favorable capital structure,” Hébert said.

Cal Dive probably won’t be the last oil company to file for bankruptcy protection — other firms have announced they’re skipping interest payments and credit experts expect more debt defaults down the road. Austin-based WBH Energy Partners had also filed for chapter 11 bankruptcy protection in Texas court in January.

---------- Post added 05-mar-2015 at 23:44 ----------

Analyzing Potential Bankruptcies in the Upstream Sector of the Oil and Gas Industry | Texas Lawyer

Oil prices continue to languish in early 2015, prompting many to look ahead toward potential restructuring opportunities. With so much focus on finding the bottom, one can only wonder what may occur before the top is again in view. This article provides some context to that intermediate analysis of what may occur within the upstream sector of the oil and gas industry.

The analysis requires some categorization at the threshold. Focusing on the upstream sector of the oil and gas industry, the two general categories are companies engaged in exploration and production versus oilfield services. The way companies within these two components of the upstream sector are built—and, thus, rebuilt through bankruptcy—vary substantially.

One critical difference is financing. OFS financing varies little from traditional business norms with the hard assets (usually made of iron in this industry), accounts receivables, and general intangibles providing the collateral. E&P companies may provide the same collateral, but E&P companies also finance their operations using their oil and gas reserves as collateral (the borrowing base). Lenders of such reserves based loans use a combination of geological and financial factors to estimate the anticipated present value of future production from the reserves included within the borrowing base. This amount affects the loan amount at which the RBL Lender is properly collateralized and thus willing to lend. And the target is a moving one as borrowing bases are subject to periodic redeterminations.

E&P companies will use hedging strategies such as futures, swaps, or option contracts as protection against future volatility in commodity prices. For a commodities seller, such contracts trade the risk of selling at market price in the future for the guarantee of a buyer agreeing to pay a set price potentially below the future market price. A company's hedging strategies factor into the borrowing base calculation because effective hedging buttresses the borrowing base by ensures future income.

An effective hedging strategy can help an E&P company weather a considerable period of depressed commodities prices. For example, an E&P company receiving $80 per barrel of oil through a futures contract for a three-year period may be relatively unscathed by a two-year drop in oil prices to $50 per barrel during the middle of the futures contract. This oversimplification demonstrates that an E&P company may protect itself through effective hedging.

But even where an E&P company is exposed and subject to a borrowing base redetermination, RBL Lenders may not wish to effectively call the loan by slashing the borrowing base. Instead, the lenders may delay or forebear a redetermination or alternatively, stair-step down the determination so as to gradually disperse the financial blow.

Under many of these situations, an E&P company may face distress, yet survive on the basis of savvy financial and operational management. OFS companies may not be so fortunate.

E&P operations have a causal relationship with OFS companies. E&P companies may cease drilling new wells, except to the point necessary to continue a lease, and thereby minimize the effect of lower prices. But the resulting effect on the oilfield services sector is traumatic. Capital budget decreases by E&P companies have a direct and meaningful impact on rig counts in the United States and the demand for oilfield services. And where demand continues, customers (E&P companies) are seeking, and expect, to extract price reductions from existing and ongoing production. For example, industry experts project that daily lease rates for drilling rigs or the cost of fracking services may drop as much as twenty percent. E&P companies may cease production altogether in areas of expensive logistics, directly affecting OFS groups with specialized technology for such areas.

As a result, providers of oilfield services are especially vulnerable and will likely face liquidity crises long before E&P companies. Moreover, leading up to the recent six-month skid in oil prices, many oilfield services providers had been using leverage to upgrade equipment in anticipation of continued high-margin production, which now only further destabilizes their financial footing.

These distinctions are important when gazing into the oil and gas crystal ball. As to the E&P side, production will continue (and likely increase) as demand has not subsided and the marginal cost for proven wells remains below even depressed prices. As to the OFS side, trouble awaits, perhaps as early as this summer. OFS providers will need liquidity as receivables dissipate, providing an opportunity for second lien lenders, or, once distress arrives, accretive acquisitions.

Bankruptcy may provide opportunities for OFS providers, either to reorganize operations as a going concern operation or to sell assets. The latter consideration is a common reason for a bankruptcy process as the Bankruptcy Code allows for assets of the bankruptcy estate to be sold free and clear of existing liens, and on an expedited basis, in certain circumstances. Bankruptcy may also provide an opportunity for the company to reject certain unfavorable contracts or unexpired leases in favor of more-favorable arrangements. Likewise, the plan of reorganization process provides the ability to force dissenting constituencies to accept the debtor's proposed treatment through the "cramdown" process.

Another relevant consideration is that the oilfield services industry is heavily dependent on management's relationships, so retaining key employees may be critical for the value of a going concern. However, such retention may pose problems as non-ordinary-course transactions (placing limits on severance or key employee retention programs).

Oil and gas may well define the world of bankruptcy in 2015, although many of these outcomes are achievable through consensual out-of-court restructurings.. Nonetheless, some correction and consolidation within the oilfield services sector is imminent. Watch for increased mergers and acquisitions activity or bankruptcies within the oilfield services industry—there is plenty of available capital. Perhaps the top again will be in view soon thereafter.
El colapso sigue avanzando.

El monstruo Cheaspeake en problemas



..... hasta que la FED saque la manguera a costa de los ciudadanos de occidente