53
The pirate and the fortress—
“Work was never pleasure for me, nor homekeeping thrift, which feeds good children. But to me oared ships were pleasure, and war, and well-glinted spears and arrow.” So speaks Odysseus, playing the pirate. This is motto and life of the pirate. Do you understand what pirate is? Many times I’m asked, why the Bronze Age? Because it’s the heroic age you see in Iliad and Odyssey, yes, but don’t forget what hero really means.
Thucydides says the men of that time enjoyed piracy, and saw nothing wrong with it, and this is true. And what is the pirate but the original form of the free man and of all ascending life! How pathetic, when you are told now about “living life,” or “having a life”—these people know nothing about what true life means. Compare the intensity of Alcibiades, that super-pirate, or of what I am about to describe here, to the “life” you’re encouraged to “have” today. How worthless the vaunting of these anxious creatures who live on pharmaceuticals, cheap wine, the rancid fart-fumes of status and approval they beg from each other. Schopenhauer says that at some point in the past all animals were herbivores, but then some species decided to take its own life in its jaws, to risk itself, and with great daring become a beast of prey, living off the hunt. The predator is always the more intelligent animal. In every decision to become a hunter or pirate, a man or a people is showing great daring and embarking on great freedom. Hero is not slave to the many, who sacrifices himself for them; the common man is awed by this kind of “sacrifice,” because they would never do this for themselves or others. But this is hero reduced to faithful dog. Wolf seeks not to “sacrifice” anything, but to discharge its powers over territory. We take the wolves and lions and leopards from among us when pups and break them with false ideas, vicious conditioning, and lately, drugs that would have lobotomized a da Vinci, an Alexander, a Frederick the Great out of existence in his youth. Then the energy that remains to them is channeled into mindless work for money. Labor and commerce are the ways to subject you to mere life and its preservation: when the superior are corrupted to a life of work and finance, they slowly move for their own destruction in the long run. I could say leisure is the source of all great things. The preservation of life is tedious; freedom from its demands is needed for all high science, art, and literature as well, and also all beautiful living, all adventures, all development of your body to the heights of beauty. One of the reasons the modern world has no great culture is because the sons of the rich have such bad conscience about not working, they all strive the same as others to climb on top of each other in normie jobs. Just fifty years ago most used to list “sportsman” as their main profession; that was in a recent time with slightly more beauty and more art.
But...but...it is wrong to look at this aspect of life, because it assumes we have more familiarity with it than we do. It’s not just that we don’t “deserve” to have a higher culture, although it’s that as well, but that the purpose of such a thing is completely alien to us. From the point of view of real culture and refinement we’re as barbaric as the most obscure herd of the Khwarezm where the women scratch their pubes in public... we’re just more tame and insipid than they were.
So when I mention leisure, don’t imagine I mean by it what you mean by it. It’s not just leisure, you don’t need just leisure for higher life, but specifically leisure for preparation for war. To escape the subjection of our time, you can’t really look to science or art any longer: you have forgotten their purpose. They’ve been defanged and almost all participation in these today amounts to a kind of cargo-cultism. Who can even think of a true scientist or artist among us? I think there is maybe a century since one existed. Just see how Cellini crafted his Perseus, in what frame of mind he was, and how foreign this is from our “artist” diddlers. Paglia says the artist is an obsessive, with a mind close to that of a stalker or serial killer, and she is right: look at monomania of Newton, or character of people like Balzac or Baudelaire. Violent spergs and obsessives. Our diddlers are diddlers because they lack all intensity and all faith in themselves and what they do. They’re not even nihilists, they lack all conviction in nihilism too: they just lack intensity, they’re pissed dry. This is why in this book I don’t promote for you the life of the scientist, or artist, or writer, because in our age these degenerate to hobbies and ways to pass the time, and there’s no value in this. People who promote these things, without really having a reason to, are just doing this to make you harmless and to advertise to others in media or elsewhere that, they too, are harmless. What past ages understood by leisure is very different from what we understand. Should robots relieve mankind of labor, there won’t be any flowering of the intellect or the arts or sciences. It’s not enough not be free from work, because the retired and the NEET’s are like this, as well as most academics and many others, but all do nothing that’s worthwhile. They’ve been reduced to a constrained and dependent state, and this is the problem. Constrained and dependent people don’t have real thoughts: for same reason that nations without manufacturing don’t really understand anymore what “innovation” and invention was for in the first place. So our science and technology too is just more diddling. Cervantes completed Don Quixote while in jail, Spinoza was a lens-grinder, Diogenes was homeless, and many other great things were done by people who were poorer or in direr straits materially than people today. And yet one can’t deny that the life of the average American is that of an overworked, over-stressed slave: but the rest that would come from relieving him of that would be just that, simple rest, if it doesn’t also come with manliness and sovereignty.
There is no substitute for freedom and power—not even the feeling of freedom of power is a substitute for the real thing. The pirate, the true warrior—not the modern soldier in subjection to a high brass eunuch—is the only free man, and it is this freedom, the primal freedom of the Bronze Age that some must recapture before anything else can be done. Listen to what Tacitus says of the ancient Germans: they preferred to win through battle the things of life, and considered it mean and petty to work the land and sweat and toil rather than to get their living by their spears and by risking their blood. They otherwise spent much of their time in feasts and idleness. The noblest youths among them, if their tribe was at peace, would go to other tribes to seek out wars, because lack of adventure was odious to their race, and only through risking blood did they win distinction. This was also attitude of the medieval knight, the chevalier, the Rittern, the riders who considered the life of the serf, of the community, to be mean and dirty, worthy of slaves and low- castes and women: they were always ready to ride away to new things and new adventures of glory and danger.
So you see, it’s not enough to say “such people were freed from caring for the necessities of life; they had leisure.” It was leisure of a very specific type. The Roman aristocracy, as Nietzsche says, had the motto otium et bellum, leisure and war, these being the only right ways of life for a man of power and freedom. In Celine’s Journey to the End of the Night I think he says at one point that his landlady, otherwise a modest woman, had an aristocratic contempt for labor; this was but an idle vestige and he makes fun of it. By his time, the last flower of the Aryan aristocracy had been extinguished, as Nietzsche says: in French Revolution, a mass revolt of racial slaves that remade Europe and took it on the downward path. Then there was another peripheral aboriginal revolt in 1917, that plunged Europe into a civil war from which it still hasn’t recovered. But in Celine’s book the main character, in his restless seeking in this trash world...he was looking for that hidden key, the true freedom into the expanse of open space that he could conquer.
Where to find the frontier? There are many places, but path is not easy. In the nations, leisure from the slave state must be secured, and this leisure must immediately be used in preparation for war. In Greek city the man of power spent his time in the hunt, at the gymnasium, in the study of military history and strategy, in every way making himself ready for war. Many think of the Greek age, when they think of its spirit, they think of a kind of solidarity and soldierly order quite different from what I talk about here...they think of the line of hoplites, and their discipline. They think of this age as one where the individual subsumed himself to the city and its laws, to the discipline of the ranks: and they connect this seeming egalitarianism to the practice of democracy in our time. In this way they want to flatter themselves. Modern man is then called on to make a similar “sacrifice,” and blamed for his selfishness. This is confused. In beginning the hoplite, the man who fought with heavy round shield, tall spike, and heavy armor, he did not come as a “tool” of the republic or a democracy, the way modern soldiers are tools of the slave state. If you want to see what the spirit of the Bronze Age is, you look to ancient drinking song, at the mess halls of Crete and Sparta: “This is my wealth: my spear and my shield. With this I trample sweet wine from the vine. With this I am called master of serfs. Those who do not dare to have spear and sword, and fine leather shield to protect skin, all cower at my knee and submit, calling me master and great king.” This was real song: a popular drinking song among the ruling men. Such formed small companies of adventurers who, early on, took over the state away from the mounted aristocracy—themselves equally piratical predators. Some time after they took over a state and established themselves as its rulers, they then “submitted” themselves to the rigors and discipline of a strict training program. But only in the sense that an athlete enters training in a team, specifically for making himself strong and ready for a task, and never losing sight of that specific task. When we see the Greek cities at their heights in the classical era for which we know this culture, ruled either by aristocracies or in some cases democracies, we see cities where such men have taken over and built a state for themselves, and for the purposes of training for battle and supremacy in battle. That same haughtiness and lust for physical power that you see in the song, that never left them. In the case of democracy the only difference is that the sailors are added also to the ruling assembly of armed men. And you can understand then the meaning of this ancient “public-spiritedness”, which isn’t that at all, but free men accepting the rigors of training together so they can preserve their freedom by force against equally haughty and hostile outsiders and against racial subordinates at home. Any “racial” unity of the Greeks was therefore only the organic unity of culture or language, but never became political: such people would never tolerate losing the sovereignty in the states they and their recent ancestors had established to protect their freedom and space to move.
But to draw any parallels to our time is absurd: these men would have never submitted to abstractions like “human rights,” or “equality,” or “the people” as some kind of amorphous entity encompassing the inhabitants of the territory or city in general. They would have rightly seen this as pure slavery, which is our condition today: no real man would ever accept the legitimacy of such an entity, which for all practical purposes means you must, for entirely imaginary reasons, defer to the opinion of slaves, aliens, fat childless women, and others who have no share in the actual physical power. How is it possible for all to have an equal share in the state and a full demand on its resources, when they in fact possess no actual physical force: and if you think this question through, you will understand also the nature of our subjection in this time. Because it is not these people who are at fault, but a hidden power that uses them as a pretext. Modern “democracy” is totalitarian and vicious, and tries to subject the best to the rule of the heaps of biological refuse and most especially to the rule of those who can stir them up. The military men who constitute its external defense and its internal police forces should in principle never accept this condition. That they do is a great question mark: how is it possible? To what end, and how did they agree to this? What’s in it for them? The ancient life that I describe here, the Bronze Age mindset, is one of complete freedom and power.
There is a hidden path for you also that remains...behind the marketplace, it begins in the thickets of small woods....it winds up many steep paths toward the high mountain air, to life in the ascent, uncorrupted by the miasma of the yeast man and the toilets in the river valleys....the life on Jason’s Argo can be reclaimed...and by some few in the modern world, it has been....
Muchas veces le han preguntado a BAP: Y porqué la Edad del Bronce? Pues porque, sí, es la época heroica que ves en la Ilíada y en la Odisea, pero no debes olvidar qué significa realmente ser un héroe
Es la frase de Odiseo la que da el lema del pirata: "El trabajo nunca me agradó, ni tampoco la economía doméstica que hacer crecer a hijos fuertes. Para mí el placer eran los barcos a remos, y la guerra, y las relucientes lanzas y la flecha"
Tucídices dice que los hombres de aquel tiempo gozaban con la piratería, y no dijo que fuera algo malo: porque el pirata es la forma original del hombre libre y de toda la vida en ascenso!
Comparadlo con el patético "vivir la vida" o "ganarse la vida" que se dice ahora: esa gente no sabe nada de lo que significa la vida verdadera
Comparad a Alcibíades, ese super-pirata, con los infraseres ansiosos de la postmodernidad, que viven a base de medicamentos, vino barato, y sus apestosos "status" y "aprobación" que suplican unos de otros
Por eso el héroe actual ha sido reducido a la condición de un perro fiel, dispuesto a sacrificarse por los demás. Pero el héroe verdadero, como el lobo, no quiere sacrificar nada, sino ejercer sus poderes sobre un territorio. Y a esos lobos nuestros, hoy los rompen a base de ideas falsas, condicionamientos enfermizos y en último término drogas que habrían lobotomizado a un Leonardo, a un Alejandro o a un Federico el Grande
Después, la poca energía que queda se canaliza hacia algún estúpido trabajo a cambio de dinero. Porque tened claro que el trabajo y el comercio son las vías para someterte en la vida simple y en su preservación. Y esto afecta también a las clases superiores
Porque una de las razones por las que el mundo moderno no tiene una gran cultura es que los hijos de los ricos tienen una mala conciencia de la vida ociosa, y son compelidos a escalar en trabajos para normies. Hace sólo 50 años, muchos se definían como "deportistas" (Nota de Gurney: la palabra tiene una connotación de "caballero", elitista). Era un tiempo con un poco más de belleza y arte
Y no es sólo que no "merezcamos" tener una cultura superior, sino que además el propósito de algo así es completamente extraño para nosotros. Desde el punto de vista de la cultura y el refinamiento, somos tan bárbaros como la más oscura horda de Corasmia (Nota de Gurney: por el mar del Aral - he tenido que buscarlo, ni idea de su existencia, jajaja) en la que las mujeres se rascaban el cachopo en público...simplemente estamos más domesticados y somos más insípidos de lo que eran ellos
Cuando BAP se refiere al tiempo libre, se refiere no sólo al ocio, sino a la preparación para la guerra. Para escapar de la sujeción de nuestro tiempo, no puedes mirar ya a la ciencia o al arte, porque su propósito ha sido olvidado: se los han cargado, y ya no es más que un culto de cargo. Ya no queda ningún artista ni científico entre nosotros. Pensad en Cellini y su Perseo (Nota de Gurney: brutal historia que trataré en este hilo), o Newton, o Balzac o Baudelaire. Básicamente son obsesivos, prácticamente maníacos, como decía Paglia. Lo que tenemos ahora son bromistas, que hacen postureo. Ni siquiera son nihilistas, les falta convicción también para eso, porque no tienen intensidad.
Por eso este libro no te dice que te hagas científico o artista o escritor , porque en nuestro tiempo han poco equilibrado en aficiones y en formas de pasar el tiempo, y no hay valor en eso. Los que promueven estas cosas sin tener realmente una razón para ello, quieren que seas inofensivo, y decirles a todos los demás que también ellos mismos son inofensivos
Y lo de que los robots liberarán a la humanidad del trabajo y habrá un renacimiento...no basta con estar libre del trabajo, porque la langostada y los ninis ya lo están, y también la mayoría de académicos, y muchos otros, y ninguno hace nada relevante. Porque el problema es que han sido reducidos a un estado de rigidez y dependencia, y la gente en esas condiciones no tienen pensamientos de verdad. De modo que el simple descanso, sin hombría y soberanía, no basta
No hay sustitutivos para la libertad y el poder: ni siquiera la sensación de ellos. El pirata, el auténtico guerrero - y no el soldado moderno sometido a un eunuco de hojalata - es el único hombre libre. Y así habla Tácito de los antiguos germanos, y era la actitud de los caballeros medievales: ganar las cosas de la vida a través de la batalla; considerar como mezquinos el labrar la tierra; pasar mucho tiempo en festines y ociosidad; buscar aventuras, gloria y peligro
Otros ejemplos son la aristocracia de la antigua Roma, o en el "Viaje al final de la noche" de Celine
Pero la Revolución Francesa, una revuelta de esclavos raciales, y la guerra civil europea que comenzó en 1917 (Nota de Gurney: BAP se refiere a la Revolución Rusa, pero yo lo situaría con la I Guerra Mundial en 1914) han extinguido las últimas flores de la aristocracia aria
Dónde encontrar entonces la frontera? Hay algunos lugares, pero el camino no es fácil
BAP habla de la Antigua Grecia, de una canción de borrachera que se cantaba en los salones de Creta y Esparta: "Ésta es mi riqueza: mi lanza y mi escudo. Con esto saco dulce vino de la viña. Con esto soy llamado dueño de sirvientes. Los que no se atreven a tener lanza y espada, y un buen escudo de cuero para proteger su piel, doblan sus rodillas y se someten, y me llaman señor y gran rey"
Pero establecer paralelismos con nuestro tiempo es absurdo. Estos hombres nunca se habrían sometido a abstracciones como los derechos humanos, o la "igualdad", o "el pueblo". Lo habrían visto como lo que son: esclavitud pura, que es nuestra condición actual. Ningún hombre de verdad puede aceptar la legitimidad de la opinión de esclavos, tarados, pu...ñeteras obesas y cualquier otro que no tenga fuerza física
La carencia de ese poder físico te permitirá entender la naturaleza de la sujeción de nuestro tiempo: es un poder oculto, que usa a esa caterva como pretexto
Pero hay un camino oculto, detrás de lo público, que comienza en los bosques...la vida de Jasón de Argos