The debate Spanish politics avoids: unemployment and job insecurity
23% of salaried workers earn less than 1,300 euros gross per month. Registered unemployment fell by 36,323 people in May 2026, the best figure in 19 years. Two sides of the same coin that, however, barely get any space in the public debate. Faced with headlines about identity, geopolitics or political memes, the real economy of households is pushed aside.
The figures nobody wants to see
The problem is not new, but the figures bring it up to date: 23% of employees earn less than 1,300 euros gross per month, according to recent data. That is about 1,100 net over twelve payments, not enough to cover an average rent in any provincial capital. Productivity per hour worked in Spain has been stagnant for decades, weighed down by a productive model anchored in tourism, construction and low-skilled services. It is not a conspiracy, it is structure: it is hard to pay high wages if each worker generates little value.
At the same time, registered unemployment fell in May by 36,323 people, the best figure for that month since 2007. Extremadura, for example, hit a historic low with 61,540 unemployed. But optimism clashes with the quality of employment: temporary, with subsistence wages and high turnover. The youth unemployment rate remains one of the highest in the OECD, comparable to that of African countries.
The silenced debate: immigration or structure?
Behind the media silence, an analytical divide emerges. On one side, those who argue that mass immigration exerts downward pressure on wages in low-skilled sectors, creating competition that harms native workers and erodes hard-won rights. On the other, those who maintain that the real problem is deindustrialisation and the lack of investment in high value-added sectors, a course set by European integration and the interests of the IBEX 35.
Both positions agree on one diagnosis: Spanish politics has given up on tackling the causes of precarious employment. The major parties, trapped in short-term management and in culture wars that do not alter the economic status quo, avoid any proposal that questions the productive model or the balance with Brussels and big business.
The cost of not talking
While the public debate fills up with symbols and artificial controversies, job insecurity becomes entrenched. The combination of low wages, high temporariness and unaffordable housing is producing a generation of working poor. Discontent, instead of being channelled into structural change, fragments into identity discourse. The result is a dead end where nobody dares to put their hands into the machinery that perpetuates the model.
The May figure is real: unemployment is falling. But if the quality of employment is not examined, the number is a mirage. The real debate is not whether there are jobs, but what kind of jobs and at what price. And that debate still has not peine.
Related debates in the forum