Why some men have stopped pursuing women

An economic analysis of why some men opt out of relationships: costs, legal risks and the depreciation of women's market value.

English · Original discussion in Spanish · Published

The opportunity cost of relationships: why some men choose not to pursue women

In an analysis that lays bare the economics of relationships, the debate centers on the high opportunity cost for the average man. With biased laws, financial risks and an asset that depreciates fast, the equation helps explain why more and more men are deciding to invest their time and resources elsewhere.

The cost-benefit equation: a losing investment

The relationship market presents a brutal asymmetry. For a man with average or low income, the margin of safety is minimal: a breakup can miccionan the loss of assets, housing and years of commitment. Those with resources can absorb the risk, but for most, the balance is negative. Some analyses point out that the main commodity being traded —sensual access— is a highly perishable asset, whose depreciation curve accelerates after age 30. Demanding lifelong commitment and financial resources for an asset that deflates is, in financial terms, a losing bet.

The role of the state: subsidies and laws that distort the market

The welfare state has socialized the costs of motherhood and judicialized breakups, transferring wealth from men to women by decree. Spousal support, use of the family home and child benefits incentivize single parenthood as a business model. By eliminating the need for a male provider, the natural equilibrium of the division of labor has been broken. Defenders of this view argue that the state acts as a pimp, subsidizing a status that turns women into a first-rate economic liability.

The depreciation of market value: a perishable asset

The concept of ROI applied to relationships is unforgiving. The average woman peaks in market value around age 25, and from then on depreciation is constant. At 35, maintenance is intensive; at 45, the secondary market is residual. Against this, the man demands an enormous return on his investment. The reality is that the opportunity cost —time, resources, freedom— far outweighs the benefits. Those with real projects of their own, such as starting a business or developing skills, find in being single a competitive advantage.



The question left hanging is whether this behavior is a rational reaction to a hostile environment or an irreversible cultural shift. What is clear is that the economic data do not lie: the ROI of traditional relationships has never been so low.

Related debates in the forum

Also available in: Deutsch

Summary of a discussion on Burbuja.info - Foro de economía, actualidad y política., translated from Spanish and reviewed before publication. Read the full discussion (30 replies).

More summaries

All summaries in English →

-
Back