You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly. You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
Why do 'ugly women' still exist? The theory that challenges Darwin
An anonymous forum debate revives an old pseudoscientific conspiracy: why natural selection hasn't eliminated unattractive women, and the surprising 'caste' theory behind it.
Why do 'ugly women' still exist? The theory that challenges Darwin
An anonymous discussion thread has revived a classic of pseudoscience: the idea that natural selection should have eliminated unattractive women by now. The premise is simple and brutal: after thousands of years of evolution, how is it possible that 'ugly' women still exist? The answer being floated is not scientific, but conspiratorial.
Among the arguments put forward, the selective reproduction theory stands out: while men, according to its defenders, are hardly selective in the sensual act, women would exercise a selection that leaves many men without offspring. Thus, ugliness would be perpetuated through a 'caste' mechanism: attractive women for the intelligent and strong elite, ugly women for the working class. A social Darwinist vision that divides humanity into two immutable strata. Other participants go further: the persistence of the 'ugly' and the 'segarro' would prove that the theory of evolution is a fraud. A logical leap that reveals more about the obsessions of those who defend it than about biology.
The debate offers no data or empirical testing, but it does offer an uncomfortable portrait of how social Darwinism and misogyny go hand in hand in the darkest corners of the internet.
Summary of a discussion on Burbuja.info - Foro de economía, actualidad y política., translated from Spanish and reviewed before publication.
Read the full discussion (11 replies).
Black people with blue eyes 15,000 years ago in England? The arguments of evolution denial that link Darwin to Freemasonry and dismiss natural selection.
Mel Gibson and Ellen DeGeneres: a disreputable outlet claims the actor sought the death penalty for the presenter over cannibalism, without any evidence.
An analysis of the social engineering technique that turns criticism into consumption: fragmentation of dissent, political atomization and the market of theories.