Why do 'ugly women' still exist? The theory that challenges Darwin

An anonymous forum debate revives an old pseudoscientific conspiracy: why natural selection hasn't eliminated unattractive women, and the surprising 'caste' theory behind it.

English · Original discussion in Spanish · Published

Why do 'ugly women' still exist? The theory that challenges Darwin

An anonymous discussion thread has revived a classic of pseudoscience: the idea that natural selection should have eliminated unattractive women by now. The premise is simple and brutal: after thousands of years of evolution, how is it possible that 'ugly' women still exist? The answer being floated is not scientific, but conspiratorial.

Among the arguments put forward, the selective reproduction theory stands out: while men, according to its defenders, are hardly selective in the sensual act, women would exercise a selection that leaves many men without offspring. Thus, ugliness would be perpetuated through a 'caste' mechanism: attractive women for the intelligent and strong elite, ugly women for the working class. A social Darwinist vision that divides humanity into two immutable strata. Other participants go further: the persistence of the 'ugly' and the 'segarro' would prove that the theory of evolution is a fraud. A logical leap that reveals more about the obsessions of those who defend it than about biology.

The debate offers no data or empirical testing, but it does offer an uncomfortable portrait of how social Darwinism and misogyny go hand in hand in the darkest corners of the internet.

Related forum threads

Summary of a discussion on Burbuja.info - Foro de economía, actualidad y política., translated from Spanish and reviewed before publication. Read the full discussion (11 replies).

More summaries

All summaries in English →

-
Back