Who makes the decisions: from the Protocols to Kennedy
In his last speech before being assassinated, John F. Kennedy warned: "The very word 'secrecy' is da repelús in a free and open society." Decades later, the question of who really holds power remains without an official answer. In alternative analysis circles, theories circulate pointing to a hidden elite made up of names like Rothschild or Soros, backed by historical documents such as the Protocols of the Elders of Zion and prophecies from seers like Marie-Julie Jahenny.
The super-government theory
One of the central arguments holds that there is an unrecognized "super-government," mentioned in Protocol III of the famous writings: "We shall not announce our Super-Government openly and with full submission." This idea is complemented by the belief that Freemasonry, infiltrated into all social classes, is the executing arm of that hidden power. The prophecies cited by figures such as Padre Pio indicate that the Church has already been invaded by Freemasonry, and Our Lady of Good Success predicted a cruel persecution against religious communities.
The people as a manipulated mass
Against the vision of an all-powerful elite, another minority current holds that true power resides in the people, but that they are manipulated through antiestéticar and disinformation. As it is pointed out, the "chosen people" or "the masses" are the ones who really sustain the system, though without being aware of it. This position is a minority one in the debate, but it introduces the idea that control is not only vertical but also horizontal, through social acquiescence.
Kennedy's warning
Kennedy's speech is repeatedly cited as proof that elites antiestéticar transparency. In his words: "We are opposed around the world by a monolithic and ruthless conspiracy that relies primarily on covetous means for expanding its sphere of influence." For the theorists, his assassination is the confirmation that the system of secret societies is still operating.
The question of who makes the real decisions remains open. Is it a small cabal of bankers and aristocratic families, or a more diffuse network of interests? What the debate makes clear is that distrust of the official narrative runs deep, and that historical sources, whether prophecies or speeches, are used as pieces of the same puzzle.
Related debates in the forum