Who pays on dates? The cost of courtship sparks debate

600 euros on Tinder, a 100,000-euro car and a dinner bill he always covers: the economics of courtship examines who bears the cost of dating.

English · Original discussion in Spanish · Published

Wanting to be liked without paying: the dilemma of dating costs

Asking someone out is expensive. At least that's what those who complain about paying for dinner, parking and the gas to pick the other person up claim. The bill comes with concrete examples: 600 euros on a dating app with no success, a 100,000-euro car to impress, and a fixed outlay on every alucinación.

The economics of courtship: dating as an investment

Spending money to impress is part of the ritual. But to what extent is it a rational investment? Some describe it as an auction in which men bid for women's attention and women decide. Others see it as exploitation in which one party bears all the costs. As the saying goes: you can't have your cake and eat it too.

Who should pay?

Opinions are divided. One camp defends splitting the bill evenly to remove the financial tension. Another holds that whoever invites sets the rules, and that anyone unwilling to pay shouldn't expect to be liked. Reality is more nuanced: many relationships grow out of a balance that isn't always monetary.

The question remains open. If the cost of courtship keeps rising, will people stop trying? Or will they simply change tactics, like bargain hunters in the market of seduction? Few want to pay, everyone wants to be liked. Someone, in the end, ends up settling the bill.

Also available in: Deutsch

Summary of a discussion on Burbuja.info - Foro de economía, actualidad y política., translated from Spanish and reviewed before publication. Read the full discussion (10 replies).

More summaries

All summaries in English →

-
Back