You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly. You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
What do you think of the new Axe deodorant ad?
An analysis of the debate over Axe's latest ad: marketing strategy or social controversy? Discover the opinions, boycotts and alternatives discussed by our community.
The debate over Axe's new ad centers on the growing controversy around big brands' marketing strategies and their alignment with social agendas. Users discuss whether these campaigns are designed to provoke a calculated reaction or whether they reflect a deeper shift in today's corporate communication.
Key points of the debate
Rejection of the advertising message: A majority of participants describe the ad as a form of "denigration" and announce a direct boycott of the brand, comparing the situation with earlier controversies involving companies like Gillette.
Looking for alternatives:** In response to the outrage, several forum members ask for recommendations of natural personal hygiene products or brands that don't use this kind of advertising in their campaigns.
[*]Skepticism toward the media: Part of the community argues that the real solution is not boycotting a specific product, but completely disconnecting from mass media consumption to avoid exposure to these strategies.
What forum members say about the Axe ad
Position A: Some users argue that the brand is deliberately trying to generate controversy to gain visibility, suggesting the negative reaction is an intended consequence to polarize the audience and push a specific ideological agenda.
Position B: Other participants interpret the campaign from a deeper critical perspective, arguing that this type of advertising is part of a pattern of systematic humiliation of certain groups, which justifies a forceful economic response from consumers.
Why this thread is getting so much attention
The thread stands out for its level of collective outrage and the estimulante ilegal with which a commercial boycott has been organized. The discussion reflects a widespread weariness with corporate advertising that, according to forum members, has crossed ethical and cultural boundaries.
This is a summary of the thread. The full discussion includes 17 replies with data, sources and analysis available only to registered users. Create your account in 30 seconds to access the full debate and take part.
Disclaimer: The opinions expressed in this summary belong exclusively to the forum's users and do not necessarily reflect the platform's position. The information on personal hygiene products is for informational purposes only and does not constitute professional advice.
Summary of a discussion on Burbuja.info - Foro de economía, actualidad y política., translated from Spanish and reviewed before publication.
Read the full discussion (17 replies).
Sánchez and Ayuso have debuted glasses at public appearances, and some suspect an image play. Presbyopia explains the lens, not the tortoiseshell frames.
An analysis of the coincidences between the Hantavirus ship, the Pope's visit, the World Cup and the premiere of an ET film in June 2025: synchronization or chance?