Wall Street pays $25,000 a day to replace analysts with AI
Wall Street is paying $25,000 a day for AI that replaces junior analysts. Investment funds save on bonuses and unions, but the system hallucinates on invoices and compliance.
English · Original discussion in Spanish · Published
$25,000 a day for an AI to do the work of Wall Street's junior analysts
The figure sounds like a joke, but it isn't. According to a video circulating these days, a Wall Street investment fund is paying $25,000 a day for an artificial intelligence system that would replace the so-called "rowers", those analysts who churn through data and crunch numbers in the offices. The idea is clear: save on salaries, bonuses and, along the way, the unions. But the system, according to early comments, is still hallucinating on invoices and has serious compliance problems. In other words, the same AI that can't read an invoice is going to manage multi-million-dollar portfolios.
The same old fat cats
The pattern repeats itself: outsource the work, now with an algorithm. The funds save on variable bonuses, the unions look the other way and then cry because there's no consumption or social security contributions. Meanwhile, yours truly is already buying junk bond ETFs and canned tuna by the pound, which is safer than entrusting your future to a model that sends you a cover letter for Uber Eats when you ask it to sort a spreadsheet.
What the data doesn't say
The question nobody answers is what will happen to the real rowers. If the AI costs 25k a day, how much does it cost to keep a human team? The math doesn't favor the employee, but the system's reliability is the big unknown. While the fat cats (read: executives) rub their hands together, everyone else watches with skepticism: the same industry now betting on AI is the one that will demand bailouts tomorrow if the algorithm screws up.
Related discussions in the forum
The figure sounds like a joke, but it isn't. According to a video circulating these days, a Wall Street investment fund is paying $25,000 a day for an artificial intelligence system that would replace the so-called "rowers", those analysts who churn through data and crunch numbers in the offices. The idea is clear: save on salaries, bonuses and, along the way, the unions. But the system, according to early comments, is still hallucinating on invoices and has serious compliance problems. In other words, the same AI that can't read an invoice is going to manage multi-million-dollar portfolios.
The same old fat cats
The pattern repeats itself: outsource the work, now with an algorithm. The funds save on variable bonuses, the unions look the other way and then cry because there's no consumption or social security contributions. Meanwhile, yours truly is already buying junk bond ETFs and canned tuna by the pound, which is safer than entrusting your future to a model that sends you a cover letter for Uber Eats when you ask it to sort a spreadsheet.
What the data doesn't say
The question nobody answers is what will happen to the real rowers. If the AI costs 25k a day, how much does it cost to keep a human team? The math doesn't favor the employee, but the system's reliability is the big unknown. While the fat cats (read: executives) rub their hands together, everyone else watches with skepticism: the same industry now betting on AI is the one that will demand bailouts tomorrow if the algorithm screws up.
Related discussions in the forum
- Incivil record certificate · 43 replies
- Why do only ugly Segarro women come our way? · 50 replies
- Woman attacks cyclist and ends up getting a beating · 48 replies
- It's over: THE WHITE HOUSE JUST PUBLISHED the existence of Aliens on its own website · 76 replies
Also available in: Deutsch
Summary of a discussion on Burbuja.info - Foro de economía, actualidad y política., translated from Spanish and reviewed before publication. Read the full discussion (22 replies).
More summaries
-
AI as an economic engine: bubble or structural shift?
Economic analysis of AI: Is it the growth engine or a speculative bubble? Energy costs and business adoption are examined.
-
Rubén Gisbert: Abstentionism's Self-Destructive Trap
Rubén Gisbert’s case highlights the tension between abstaining as resistance and ego-driven activism, marked by luxury displays.
-
Australians have been fooled at scale 2000
The supposed rise of the right in Australia hides globalist candidates. We analyze the debate on the new woke far right at Burbuja.info.
-
Breaking: Spanish police unit UDEF awaits judge's orders to arrest Zapatero
Is the UDEF investigating Zapatero? We examine the rumours about a possible arrest of Spain's former prime minister and the legal situation fueling political debate.
-
Iran's war proved a major letdown
Iran's war was not the armed conflict many expected, but it delivered economic goals: higher oil prices and speculation. An analysis of the real winners.
-
less Spanish more third-world 2022-2025
The exodus of Spaniards abroad now exceeds 3 million while Colombia leads immigration into Spain. Data, causes and the debate over demographic replacement.