Vox wants only Spanish fruit in Aragon schools
Vox has proposed that schools in Aragon, Spain, serve only Spanish fruit and vegetables. The measure clashes with the fact that its MEPs voted in favour of free trade with V
English · Original discussion in Spanish · Published
Vox demands removal of foreign fruit from school canteens in Aragon
Vox's proposal in the Cortes de Aragón (the regional parliament of Aragon, Spain) has peine the debate over the origin of food in schools. "We cannot serve pears from South Africa and oranges from Egypt," the party argues, proposing that all fruit and vegetables served in Aragonese school canteens be domestically produced. The initiative, which has been rejected by all other political groups, forms part of a long-standing demand of the Spanish farming sector, which denounces unfair competition from imported products subject to less restrictive health and phytosanitary standards.
The fine print of the proposal
Behind the protectionist slogan lies an argument that goes beyond the local: Spanish farmers are subject to far stricter controls than those in third countries, which drives up their production costs and makes them less competitive. Supporters of the measure add that the traceability of foreign products is often opaque, posing a risk to pupils' health. However, the proposal does not clarify how the extra cost would be funded, nor whether it would also apply to other foods on the menu.
The European consistency problem
The initiative clashes head-on with the trade policy that Vox's own MEPs have supported in Brussels. According to European Parliament records, Vox MEP Hermann Tertsch voted in favour of the free trade agreement with Vietnam, while two other party representatives abstained. These agreements facilitate precisely the entry of fruit and vegetables from Southeast Asia under advantageous tariff conditions. The contradiction has not gone unnoticed by those who point out that Vox's selective protectionism smells more like posturing than conviction.
The debate ends in a draw: while some defend local consumption as a health and economic shield, others point out that the underlying problem — the regulatory imbalance between domestic and imported production — is not solved by bans, but by demanding the same standards from everyone. The table is set, but the main course remains the same as ever: who pays the difference.
Related discussions in the forum
Vox's proposal in the Cortes de Aragón (the regional parliament of Aragon, Spain) has peine the debate over the origin of food in schools. "We cannot serve pears from South Africa and oranges from Egypt," the party argues, proposing that all fruit and vegetables served in Aragonese school canteens be domestically produced. The initiative, which has been rejected by all other political groups, forms part of a long-standing demand of the Spanish farming sector, which denounces unfair competition from imported products subject to less restrictive health and phytosanitary standards.
The fine print of the proposal
Behind the protectionist slogan lies an argument that goes beyond the local: Spanish farmers are subject to far stricter controls than those in third countries, which drives up their production costs and makes them less competitive. Supporters of the measure add that the traceability of foreign products is often opaque, posing a risk to pupils' health. However, the proposal does not clarify how the extra cost would be funded, nor whether it would also apply to other foods on the menu.
The European consistency problem
The initiative clashes head-on with the trade policy that Vox's own MEPs have supported in Brussels. According to European Parliament records, Vox MEP Hermann Tertsch voted in favour of the free trade agreement with Vietnam, while two other party representatives abstained. These agreements facilitate precisely the entry of fruit and vegetables from Southeast Asia under advantageous tariff conditions. The contradiction has not gone unnoticed by those who point out that Vox's selective protectionism smells more like posturing than conviction.
The debate ends in a draw: while some defend local consumption as a health and economic shield, others point out that the underlying problem — the regulatory imbalance between domestic and imported production — is not solved by bans, but by demanding the same standards from everyone. The table is set, but the main course remains the same as ever: who pays the difference.
Related discussions in the forum
- Fascism as a secular religion. · 82 replies
- The US won't give up, we're off to hell. · 39 replies
- Gibraltar · 370 replies
- Francisco jose fernandez cruz sequera · 1222 replies
Also available in: Deutsch
Summary of a discussion on Burbuja.info - Foro de economía, actualidad y política., translated from Spanish and reviewed before publication. Read the full discussion (67 replies).
More summaries
-
PSOE certifies Sánchez's downfall and activates 'survival of the fittest'
The PSOE certifies Sánchez's decline and activates the 'survival of the fittest' operation ahead of the legislative end. Crisis in Ceuta, municipal rebellion, and...
-
Quechua tents and Soros accusation in a protest camp
Quechua tents at a protest camp and an unproven accusation of links to Soros are at the centre of the debate
-
Wow, today's antifascism in Spain is going hard..
A photo of Pablo Iglesias, Irene Montero and the head of FACUA at an antifascist event reopens the debate over the politicization of Spanish consumer associations.
-
Spain's flag goes 'chav': who's flying it now?
From well-dressed women to tattooed chavs: the social profile of those flying the Spanish flag is changing. Degradation or democratization of the symbol?
-
Pablo Iglesias joins flotilla to Cuba challenging Trump's blockade
Pablo Iglesias, Jeremy Corbyn and Clara López are travelling in a flotilla carrying 20 tonnes of aid to Cuba to challenge the US blockade, amid threats…
-
Ceuta crisis: hundreds swim in despite drones and lasers
Four dead and more than a hundred minors reach Ceuta despite drones and thermal cameras. The ban on summary pushbacks rekindles the border crisis.