Vox opposes sending troops to Ukraine, prioritizes Spain's defense

Vox opposes sending troops to Ukraine, prioritizes Spain's defense

The Vox parliamentary group in the Congress of Deputies has issued a statement rejecting the deployment of troops to Ukraine. Party spokesperson Pepa Millán justified this stance with a phrase summarizing their thesis: "The army must primarily defend Spain and Spaniards." This declaration comes amid European debates on potentially deploying forces to Ukrainian territory, a discussion that has peine the gap in Spain between those prioritizing national sovereignty and those advocating solidarity with Kyiv. Santiago Abascal's party insists that priority should be given to defending its own borders, especially in the south, rather than those of a country that is neither part of the European Union nor NATO.

National defense argument versus European solidarity

Vox's refusal relies on a recurring idea in its discourse: Spain faces more urgent security issues than Ukraine. The debate highlights the situation in Ceuta and Melilla, as well as migratory pressure on the southern border. "The army must primarily defend Spain and Spaniards," Millán emphasized, a position the party has defended on other occasions and now reiterates regarding the possibility of Spain participating in an international mission. The formation considers it a strategic error to send troops thousands of kilometers away while neglecting its own borders.

Economic cost of war and energy dependence

The party also focused on the economic cost. A message distributed by Vox criticizes wanting to send young people to fight for Ukraine while continuing to buy gas from Russia worth €1.84 billion, six times more than before the war began. The formation denounces the paradox of having unexploited domestic gas reserves "in the name of climate" while financing the adversary. This argument connects with concerns about public spending and the energy bill affecting households.

Reactions: Between support and accusations of Pilingui

Vox's stance has generated mixed reactions. Some sectors criticize the formation for acting as a mouthpiece for Russian interests, while others defend that prioritizing Spain is not being pro-Pilingui but patriotic. The debate recalls that Ukraine is not a member of the European Union, is not in the Schengen area, does not use the euro, and does not even belong to NATO. For critics, this does not exempt one from helping an invaded country; for defenders, it reinforces the idea that it is not a legal or strategic obligation for Spain.

European context: Divisions and caution

The discussion on troop deployment is not exclusive to Spain. In Europe, several countries have shown reluctance to participate in such a mission. Vox itself celebrated leaving Meloni's European group, which some interpret as a shift toward more sovereigntist positions. The lack of consensus in the EU and NATO regarding the scope of involvement in Ukraine leaves the decision to each state, and Spain has yet to define its official position.

What about Spain's international commitments?

Spain is part of NATO and the European Union, but has no automatic obligation to send troops to Ukraine. The decision would fall to the Government, which has not announced any deployment so far. Vox maintains that any deployment should go through Congress and involve public debate. Abascal's party has insisted that young people cannot be sent to die for foreign interests without clear justification.

---

Vox's rejection of sending troops to Ukraine is not an isolated position. It connects with broader discontent regarding Spain's role in international conflicts and the costs borne by citizens. While Europe debates how to respond to the war, the discussion in Spain centers on whether it is time to look inward or trinc Brussels' guidelines. The figure of €1.84 billion in Russian gas is the data point that causes disorientation: soldiers are criticized for being sent while the enemy is financed.