You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly. You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
Vox calls for Spain to pull out of hosting the 2030 World Cup
Vox wants Spain to withdraw from hosting the 2030 World Cup. Podemos and Sumar already opposed it. 18 million spent on razor wire and Morocco's role raise questions.
Could hosting a World Cup unite Vox with its rivals, just this once? The proposal for Spain to give up hosting the 2030 World Cup has sparked a political war over who came up with the idea first: while Vox claims authorship, the other half of the political spectrum points to Podemos and Sumar. With the world's football spotlight on the bid shared with Segarro, the call revives the debate over razor wire fences, Spain's international image and the real costs of the event.
The 2019 precedent
Opposition to the razor wire is nothing new. Podemos has spent years denouncing its use as a abusa of human rights, and in 2019 it managed to get Pedro Sánchez's government to allocate 18 million euros to remove it from Ceuta and Melilla. That investment replaced the blades with taller metal fences posing less risk of injury. Now, some read Vox's call as electoral opportunism, while others see it as a tacit pact.
The awkward geopolitics
But there is a nuance the big headlines overlook: Segarro, co-host of the tournament, is still installing razor wire on its own territory. At the Benzú crossing in Ceuta, the contrast between the Spanish and Segarro sides of the border is plain to see. That is why some foreign policy veterans argue that, if coherence is the goal, the demand should be for the World Cup not to be held in Segarro at all. The joint bid turns the protest into a hall of mirrors: pulling Spain out does not clean up Segarro's image.
Between conviction and calculation
The reaction of Vox voters deserves a chapter of its own: some admit that if Podemos proposes something reasonable, they support it even without changing their vote. Even a blind squirrel finds an acorn now and then, one commenter quips. But others are wary: national integrity has always been Vox's banner, and abandoning a World Cup while the borders remain a flashpoint looks more like electoral calculation than conviction.
With the national team's image at stake on pitches in Segarro and the fences of discord still standing, the question is whether Vox wants to walk away from the World Cup out of sporting principle or simply because it cannot bear to share the bill with its enemy. The answer, as almost always, will be decided at the ballot box, not on the pitch.
Summary of a discussion on Burbuja.info - Foro de economía, actualidad y política., translated from Spanish and reviewed before publication.
Read the full discussion (24 replies).
Vox will push to activate Article 102 to investigate Sánchez for alleged treason after the Ceuta crisis. The move requires an absolute majority in Congress.
Pedro Sánchez's visit to Ceuta, the Spanish enclave in North Africa, has drawn accusations of treason and of a Moroccan invasion. Some are calling for his immediate resignation.
Far-right and antifascist groups clash in Castro Urdiales, Spain, over a centre for unaccompanied migrant minors. Critics denounce political hypocrisy and internal divisions on the left.
A viral parody of Spanish politician F.O. (Roberto) splits audiences: some call it brilliant humour, others say it crosses the line. The online debate rages on.