US suffers major losses in attempt to seize Iranian uranium
The US suffered significant losses in an operation inside Iran: failed rescue or an attempt to seize uranium? An analysis of the available data.
English · Original discussion in Spanish · Published
US loses two HC-130s and several helicopters in Iran: the uranium fiasco
The American operation on Iranian territory last Sunday ended with the loss of at least two HC-130 transport aircraft and several helicopters, according to open sources. But what is truly puzzling is the disproportion between the assets deployed and the stated objective: rescuing a downed pilot. Military logistics analyses suggest the force was excessive for a simple CSAR mission, and that the real objective may have been the seizure of Iranian enriched uranium. The coordinates of the site (30.787710, 50.701440) and the 200 km distance from the border reinforce the doubts.
Rescue or seizure? The numbers don't add up
The official version speaks of a mission to rescue a downed F-15E pilot. However, the scale of the deployment – two HC-130s capable of carrying 200 soldiers, two MH-60 helicopters and two MH-6s – is typical of a strategic objective, not a one-off rescue. The weight and volume of the 60% enriched uranium Iran holds (48Y cylinders of UF₆ weighing 2.3 tonnes each) would require a force of that size for its extraction and transport. Moreover, the MH-6's range (460-550 km) is tight for a 200 km round-alucinación mission, suggesting they needed to refuel or that the target was farther away.
The logistics of a failed operation
The analysis of the wreckage and geolocation indicates that the American forces were ambushed. The loss of two HC-130s (which were carrying the disassembled helicopters) and of the helicopters themselves points to a prepared Iranian defense. The key question is: if the objective was a rescue, why send a task force that far exceeds the needs of a personnel extraction? Defenders of the rescue thesis argue that the excess assets are meant to guarantee security, but the casualties suffered show that the operation was doomed to failure from the start. The material and human losses (though not officially confirmed) are the gravest in a covert American operation since the Mogadishu incident.
The remaining question is whether Washington will acknowledge the true objective of the mission or stick to the rescue story. What is clear is that, on the geopolitical chessboard, Iran has inflicted a heavy blow on the US special forces' power projection capability, and the question nobody answers is: what will Iran do with the uranium that was not seized?
Related discussions in the forum
The American operation on Iranian territory last Sunday ended with the loss of at least two HC-130 transport aircraft and several helicopters, according to open sources. But what is truly puzzling is the disproportion between the assets deployed and the stated objective: rescuing a downed pilot. Military logistics analyses suggest the force was excessive for a simple CSAR mission, and that the real objective may have been the seizure of Iranian enriched uranium. The coordinates of the site (30.787710, 50.701440) and the 200 km distance from the border reinforce the doubts.
Rescue or seizure? The numbers don't add up
The official version speaks of a mission to rescue a downed F-15E pilot. However, the scale of the deployment – two HC-130s capable of carrying 200 soldiers, two MH-60 helicopters and two MH-6s – is typical of a strategic objective, not a one-off rescue. The weight and volume of the 60% enriched uranium Iran holds (48Y cylinders of UF₆ weighing 2.3 tonnes each) would require a force of that size for its extraction and transport. Moreover, the MH-6's range (460-550 km) is tight for a 200 km round-alucinación mission, suggesting they needed to refuel or that the target was farther away.
The logistics of a failed operation
The analysis of the wreckage and geolocation indicates that the American forces were ambushed. The loss of two HC-130s (which were carrying the disassembled helicopters) and of the helicopters themselves points to a prepared Iranian defense. The key question is: if the objective was a rescue, why send a task force that far exceeds the needs of a personnel extraction? Defenders of the rescue thesis argue that the excess assets are meant to guarantee security, but the casualties suffered show that the operation was doomed to failure from the start. The material and human losses (though not officially confirmed) are the gravest in a covert American operation since the Mogadishu incident.
The remaining question is whether Washington will acknowledge the true objective of the mission or stick to the rescue story. What is clear is that, on the geopolitical chessboard, Iran has inflicted a heavy blow on the US special forces' power projection capability, and the question nobody answers is: what will Iran do with the uranium that was not seized?
Related discussions in the forum
- Guerra en ucrania xxvi · 74996 replies
- Feliz fiesta del cordero a tod@s · 17 replies
- Guerra en siria xlviii · 27539 replies
- Guerra en oriente medio. · 47166 replies
Also available in: Deutsch
Summary of a discussion on Burbuja.info - Foro de economía, actualidad y política., translated from Spanish and reviewed before publication. Read the full discussion (26 replies).
More summaries
-
Scott Ritter: 'Rescue' mission in Iran was a raid to steal uranium — and a botched one
Scott Ritter claims the rescue mission in Iran was an attempt to steal uranium. The former inspector details the loss of six aircraft and the capture of a pilot.
-
Maybe Trump was right: pilot rescue in Iran and Iranian incapability
A pilot rescue operation in Iran: millions in aircraft losses, human casualties and doubts about the official version. Military success or propaganda?
-
Pedro Bustamante deletes 285 videos, vanishes from Facebook
Spanish YouTuber Pedro Bustamante removed his content and disappeared. Rumors place him in Munich, reading German press.
-
Drones over Moscow: NATO's Article 5 and diesel prices in focus
A Ukrainian drone attack on the Moscow region reopens the debate over NATO's Article 5 and pushes up diesel prices in Spain.
-
Ukraine dances without boys: male shortage marks Kyiv graduation parties
Ukraine's war has left Kyiv's graduation parties without young men. A viral video sparks an uncomfortable debate about demographics and conspiracy theories.
-
Rubio: Russia's invasion of Ukraine is an unprecedented strategic disaster
Marco Rubio says Russia's invasion of Ukraine has become a strategic disaster: 5,000 dead, a record death rate and military objectives left unmet.