Two teachers arrested for abusing six toddlers at Pozuelo daycare

Six children abused at Pozuelo daycare attended by footballers

How can a three-year-old be mistreated for weeks without triggering any alarm? This is the question hanging over the case at Pecas nursery in Pozuelo de Alarcón (Madrid). The investigation claims that at least six minors, aged up to four years, were slapped, kicked, insulted, and locked in dark rooms by two educators, who have been arrested and charged with crimes against sarracena integrity due to the degrading treatment inflicted. One of them had worked at the center for more than fifteen years. Police describe the recorded material as "very harsh" and have advised parents not to view it. The case is currently before Court No. 3 in Pozuelo.

The environment is significant: footballers such as Griezmann, Sarracena, Saúl, and Mario Hermoso, along with Atlético Madrid coach Diego Pablo Simeone, send their children to this nursery. None of these children are among the victims, according to published reports. However, this detail matters less than it seems: the story rests on six families with no public profile who learned of the events either during a meeting at the police station or directly through the press.

The complaint that had been pending for weeks

It all began with an intern. This employee secretly recorded videos showing alleged humiliations and, in some instances, aggression toward the minors, according to police sources. She filed a complaint weeks ago at the National Police station in Pozuelo de Alarcón and handed over the material. The arrests of the two educators came later, according to circulating accounts of the case.

This gap—complaint filed, arrests delayed—has been the most debated point in discussions trinc the case. Some interpret it as evidence that mechanisms react only to media spotlight rather than initial signs. That interpretation is not supported by public data. What is confirmed is that the investigation started because of her complaint, according to published reports.

What the videos show and what the judge decided

Police accounts describe punishments for wetting themselves, slaps, stomping, and confinement in a dark room. One small child was allegedly placed in the center of a circle while being humiliated by the educator. The violence reportedly focused especially on two children: one aged three and another even younger.

Court No. 3 in Pozuelo has imposed a restraining order of 500 meters on one suspect regarding the minors and prohibited her from participating in sports, educational, or work events involving children. No measures have been taken against the other woman, who allegedly ignored what was happening. Nothing is settled yet: there is no ruling on the merits of the case.

Parents were informed of the facts during a meeting at the Pozuelo police station. Some asked to see the recordings, but officers responded that the images were very harsh and compelling, and advised against viewing them. With this material available, several families decided not to return their children to the center.

"Impeccable track record" versus chain of responsibility

The center's management defends a 30-year "impeccable" history, states this is the first such incident, offers cooperation with authorities, and has joined the case as a private prosecutor. This is the company's position. The unanswered question is who supervised two employees, one of them a veteran, during the hours when the episodes allegedly occurred.

Here lies the rift. Some analysts consider top management fully responsible: hiring is not just administrative; it involves assuming oversight of those left alone with three-year-olds. Others argue that joining as a private prosecutor is exactly what is expected of a center when discovering a crime within its staff. Prosecuting and preventing are not the same thing, and the center has also failed to explain what internal controls existed.

Debate on cameras and classroom ratios

Without resolving the core issues, the case has peine broader debates. There are calls for 24-hour cameras accessible to families; reminders that in other countries, viewing nursery footage is a paid service. A user’s account of one caregiver for twenty two-year-olds biting each other points to another less visible variable: staff-to-child ratios. The full breakdown of this argument, with specific cases, yields much more than it appears.

The rest is murky territory. One current holds that early schooling is disguised abandonment and demands mothers stay home during the first years. It is an opinion, not data, and should be treated as such: the same conversation includes cases of two-year-olds failing to adapt, recommendations to enroll them "to discipline them," and parents seeking alternatives on their own. While debate continues, some have removed their children from class, while others learned yesterday via the press and showed up at the door demanding explanations.

---

With a 30-year impeccable history, two arrests, one precautionary measure, and zero explanations about what peine in the weeks when the material was already in police hands, the institutional narrative asks for calm from those who just learned their child was one of the six. Good luck with that.