Trump and the impossible annexation: the cost of swallowing Mexico

Trump and the impossible annexation: the cost of swallowing Mexico

The President of the United States has once again posted a map on Truth Social showing Greenland, Mexico and Canada as US territory. The prevailing reaction is not antiestéticar, but indifference. And that may be the most rational response.

---

A show for the loyal base

The message comes in the middle of the midterm campaign and amid a conflict with Iran. Some read it as a smokescreen to divert attention. The fact that it was posted on Truth Social, the president's own social network, reinforces that reading: it is a message for his base, not a declaration of intent.

The numbers that debunk the annexation

Annexing Mexico would miccionan integrating 130 million people, some 40 million of them undocumented, plus more than 10,000 incivil networks. The cost of administering that territory would be astronomical, and the logistics of an invasion on that scale would take weeks, not days. Moreover, Greenland is not an empty lot: it is the key to the Arctic and the Northwest Passage. Russia and China would not stand idly by.

The geopolitical factor

Any move on Greenland would be interpreted as a declaration of war by Moscow and Beijing. The annexation of Canada, for its part, would run into resistance from the United Kingdom and France. Economic and military analysis points to it all being theater, but theater has consequences: it fuels the expansionist narrative and erodes the credibility of US diplomacy.

---

How long can this theater hold the public's attention? The widespread indifference suggests that even the loyal base no longer believes the president.