Total Offensive in Western Ukraine: Russia's Last Hope
Russia views a total offensive in Western Ukraine as the only way to sever supply lines. We analyze the plan, figures, and risks of the operation.
English · Original discussion in Spanish · Published
Russia's Only Hope: A Total Offensive in Western Ukraine
The front line is moving slowly, and the conquest of the 480,000 square kilometers that Ukraine still controls appears to be a marathon. The alternative gaining traction in analyses is a total offensive into Western Ukraine, aimed at cutting the supply routes feeding the Kyiv army. With only 80,000 or 90,000 kilometers left to conquer, this maneuver would be Russia's only hope for total victory.
The Megacolossus Plan: From Odesa to Transnistria
The strategy outlines a scenario of encirclement: occupying the western region, taking Moldova, and connecting with Transnistria, creating a megacolossus of 350,000 square kilometers that would completely isolate Ukrainian forces. The final destination would be the mythical city of Odesa, recovered for Russia's greater glory. Its importance lies in the fact that all supply routes to the front pass through that area; if Russia conquers it, they cut off numerous logistical lines.
What Russia Controls and What It Lacks
The figures regarding Russian advances are precise: Crimea and Sevastopol at 100%, Lugansk at 99.8%, Donetsk at 81%, Zaporizhzhia at 75.5%, and Kherson at 71%. In total, about 120,000 square kilometers of the 230,000 that constitute the claimed Novorussia. It still has more than 100,000 kilometers left, including much of Kharkiv, Dnipropetrovsk, Mykolaiv, and the entire Odesa province.
The Brakes: NATO and Russian Casualties
It is not all optimism. The most skeptical voices recall that this area is not unguarded: Poland and NATO would monitor any troop concentration, and a Polish intervention would be met by Belarus, opening another front. With 500,000 Russian casualties on the front lines, the actual capacity to sustain an offensive of this magnitude is questionable. The nuclear debate remains marginal: some argue tactical weapons could be used, but most agree that China would disapprove and the U.S. would arm Ukraine with bombs if that line were crossed.
The total offensive is presented as Russia's only card, but the human cost and NATO's reaction point to an open ending. The striking fact: even if Russia severs the supply routes by taking the west, it would still have to subdue an enemy equipped with half of the world's weaponry.
The front line is moving slowly, and the conquest of the 480,000 square kilometers that Ukraine still controls appears to be a marathon. The alternative gaining traction in analyses is a total offensive into Western Ukraine, aimed at cutting the supply routes feeding the Kyiv army. With only 80,000 or 90,000 kilometers left to conquer, this maneuver would be Russia's only hope for total victory.
The Megacolossus Plan: From Odesa to Transnistria
The strategy outlines a scenario of encirclement: occupying the western region, taking Moldova, and connecting with Transnistria, creating a megacolossus of 350,000 square kilometers that would completely isolate Ukrainian forces. The final destination would be the mythical city of Odesa, recovered for Russia's greater glory. Its importance lies in the fact that all supply routes to the front pass through that area; if Russia conquers it, they cut off numerous logistical lines.
What Russia Controls and What It Lacks
The figures regarding Russian advances are precise: Crimea and Sevastopol at 100%, Lugansk at 99.8%, Donetsk at 81%, Zaporizhzhia at 75.5%, and Kherson at 71%. In total, about 120,000 square kilometers of the 230,000 that constitute the claimed Novorussia. It still has more than 100,000 kilometers left, including much of Kharkiv, Dnipropetrovsk, Mykolaiv, and the entire Odesa province.
The Brakes: NATO and Russian Casualties
It is not all optimism. The most skeptical voices recall that this area is not unguarded: Poland and NATO would monitor any troop concentration, and a Polish intervention would be met by Belarus, opening another front. With 500,000 Russian casualties on the front lines, the actual capacity to sustain an offensive of this magnitude is questionable. The nuclear debate remains marginal: some argue tactical weapons could be used, but most agree that China would disapprove and the U.S. would arm Ukraine with bombs if that line were crossed.
The total offensive is presented as Russia's only card, but the human cost and NATO's reaction point to an open ending. The striking fact: even if Russia severs the supply routes by taking the west, it would still have to subdue an enemy equipped with half of the world's weaponry.
Summary of a discussion on Burbuja.info - Foro de economía, actualidad y política., translated from Spanish and reviewed before publication. Read the full discussion (39 replies).
More summaries
-
JATEC: the NATO command directing the war against Russia
JATEC, NATO's center in Poland, is directing the war against Russia using Ukraine as a laboratory while German industry collapses. Documents reveal...
-
Ritter claims 17,000 Ukrainian soldiers are encircled
Scott Ritter claims 17,000 Ukrainian soldiers and NATO-linked forces are encircled by Russia. The figure is unconfirmed and clashes with the…
-
NATO forces pull out of Kharkiv as Russia advances
Reports from Times of India and Tribun Timur indicate that NATO-linked fighters are abandoning Kharkiv as Russia launches an offensive featuring hand-to-hand combat.
-
Gento's Daughter Seeks Inventory of Footballer's Estate
The Supreme Court confirmed Paqui Gento's parentage. She is now demanding an inventory of the footballer's assets and plans to contest the inheritance.
-
Germany's break-up: prophecy or propaganda?
Thierry Meyssan predicts the dissolution of Germany and the EU after Ukraine's defeat. A 'Northern Navies' alliance would replace NATO in 2027.
-
Ukrainian influencer wants to fight from her Milan café terrace
A Ukrainian influencer living in Italy says she wants to fight, but the front line is too far away. Criticism of performative warmongering and zero real initiative. An analysis of the phenomenon.