The top PAU scorer's advice nobody should trinc
"If you've worked hard, no matter how badly you think you're doing, you'll do well in the exams." With that sentence, Carmen García, the student from Córdoba who scored 13.975 out of 14 in Spain's 2022 university entrance exam (Selectividad), meant to offer advice to future test-takers. However, an analysis of her recommendation reveals a deeper problem: the official message of the PAU as a test of effort clashes with the reality of a system that measures memory more than analytical ability.
Generic advice versus real strategies
García's advice —organization and not cramming— is well-intentioned but empty. Those who have examined the Selectividad in depth point to far more effective tactics: practicing with past exam papers available for free online, registering as a resident in autonomous communities where the tests are easier (such as certain areas of Extremadura or Andalusia), or even taking a high-scoring advanced vocational course to gain direct access to the specific phase. Meanwhile, the local press builds front pages around the "new Einstein" even though her choice of degree —a double degree in Translation and International Relations at Pablo de Olavide University— is hardly the route to high financial returns.
The price of image in academic merit
Media coverage focused on the student's looks, diverting attention from what really matters: the Selectividad as a bureaucratic filter that rewards memorization, not critical thinking. With a score that would have peine the doors of Medicine or Engineering, García chose pure humanities, which some analysts consider a strategic waste. The paradox is obvious: she is presented as a model of hard work, but her path rather reflects the conformity of someone who, despite being able to choose degrees with high employability, opts for those with uncertain prospects.
The debate leaves one question hanging: if the university admission system is as perfect as it is sold, why are practical tips —switching regions, using exam tricks— so much better than official words of encouragement? The answer, probably, is that it isn't.
Related debates in the forum