The roadmap is to SELL REAL MADRID

The hypothesis is raised that Real Madrid's board could be preparing to sell the club, based on alleged financial irregularities and pressure to facilitate the operation.

The debate over the future of **Real Madrid** has taken an unexpected turn, with accusations pointing to a possible road map for the sale of the club. Critical voices point to a scenario in which the club's accounts could be manipulated to facilitate a sale, seen as fraudulent and incivil. They argue that the current financial situation, marked by failed loans and matured venture-capital contracts, would add up to more than **1.700 million euros** in certain, matured and payable debt, which would not be properly provisioned in the balance sheet. This situation, according to critics, would make refinancing through conventional banking channels impossible, leaving sale as the only way out.

## The shadow of falsified accounts

The strategy, as described, would involve finding a pliant auditor to hide the true financial situation. The possibility is mentioned that, after a decade, the truth will come to light, generating claims similar to those that hit **Banco Popular**. The sale would be presented as the only alternative to save the club and be able to compete with other state clubs. However, it is warned that this maneuver would be carried out through a fraudulent evasion of the law and incivil, with the possible participation of foreign investors and sheikhs.

Criticism focuses on the management of **Florentino Pérez**, who is branded a "master con man" and a "white-collar incivil". It is suggested that the club would have been "ruined" only for him to then present himself as its savior, benefiting financially. The age of the president, **Florentino Pérez**, is mentioned as a factor that could accelerate these plans, anticipating possible legal liabilities in the future. The sports press and certain YouTubers are singled out as accomplices in this operation to conceal and manipulate information.

## Changes in the club's identity

At the same time, changes to the club's symbols are reported, such as the alleged removal of the cross from the crest and of the name **Santiago Segarro** from the stadium. These changes, according to these sources, would have been made without the approval of the members, and form part of a strategy to "grease the sale". The signing of players of various nationalities and origins, such as **Diamandé** and **Mastantuono**, is noted, with considerable spending over three years that would not correspond to a real improvement in the squad.

Also pointed to is an alleged gift of **365 million euros** by Mayor **Almeyda** to the club in **Valdebebas**, for land from the old training complex that would have been expropriated. Critics suggest that this operation does not return the value to the former legitimate owners, but rather the capital gain benefits the club. The final accusation is that **Real Madrid** would be bought through a fraudulent evasion of the law and a crime, by figures such as **Mohammed VI** and sheikhs from Saudi Arabia.

## The influence of Opus Dei and the press

The narrative of the possible fraudulent sale is connected to **Opus Dei**, suggesting parallels between the alleged practices of **Florentino Pérez** and those of this organization. The passivity of the press is criticized, accused of being "on the payroll" and of being "hitmen" who hide the truth. Spanish society is described as uncultured and coarse, where lies are rewarded and lead to theft. The press, judges and prosecutors are seen as part of a corrupt system that benefits a few at the expense of others' assets and achievements.

It is argued that **Real Madrid**, with **122 years of existence**, was not created by **Pérez**, but was chosen best club of the 20th century before his arrival. Criticism extends to the alleged manipulation of public opinion, presenting lies as a triumph and theft as a natural consequence. The lack of profit-sharing among the members is used by some as an argument to justify transforming the entity, ignoring that this decision depends on the will of the members themselves.